The lower boundary of the Triassic and its correlation in marine sediments: Paper 1. Boundary sections of the Tethys

Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 116-129

  Shevyrev, A A ^a  

^a PALEONTOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Ammonite zones; Faunal assemblages; Lowermost Triassic; Tethyan sections; Uppermost Permian

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944488610     PISSN: 08695938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bando, Yu., On the Otoceratidae and Ophiceratidae, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ., Ser. 2, 1973, Special vol. 6, pp. 337-351.
2. Bando, Yu., Upper Permian and Lower Triassic Ammonoids from Abadeh, Central Iran, Mem. Fac. Educ. Kagawa Univ., 1979, Pt. 2, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 103-138.
3. Bhatt, D.K. and Arora, R.K., Otoceras Beds of Himalaya and Permian-Triassic Boundary, J. Geol. Soc. India, 1984, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 720-727.
4. Bhatt, D.K. and Joshi, V.K., A Note on the Occurrence of Glyptophiceras Spath from Spiti, with Preliminary Observations on the Fauna of Otoceras-Ophiceras Beds, Rec. Geol. Surv. India, 1981, vol. 112, Pt. 8, pp. 51-54.
5. Dagys, A.S. and Dagys, A.A., Biostratigraphy of the Lowermost Triassic and the Boundary between Paleozoic and Mesozoic, Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 1988, vol. 34, pp. 313-320.
6. Diener, C., Über das Alter der Otoceras Beds im Himalaya, Zentralbl. Miner. Geol. Palaontol., 1901, pp. 513-518.
7. Diener, C., Über die stratigraphische Stellung der Otoceras Beds des Himalaya, Zentralbl. Miner. Geol. Palaontol., 1905, pp. 1-9, 36-45.
8. Diener, C., The Trias of the Himalaya, Mem. Geol. Surv. India, 1912, vol. 36, Pt. 3, pp. 1-159.
9. Griesbach, C.L., Palaeontological Notes on the Lower Trias of the Himalayas, Rec. Geol. Surv. India, 1880, vol. 13, Pt. 2., p. 83-113.
10. Iranian-Japanese Research Region, Central Iran, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ. Ser. Geol. Mineral., 1981, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 61-133.
11. Ishibashi, T. and Chonglakmani, Ch., Uppermost Permian Ammonoids from Northern Thailand, J. Southeast Asia Earth Sci., 1990, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 163-170.
12. Ishibashi, T., Nakornsri, N., and Nagai, K., Permian-Triassic Boundary and Fauna at Doi Pha Phlung, Northern Thailand, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kushu Univ. Ser. D, 1994, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 23-40.
13. Jin, Yu., Shen, Sh., Zhu, Z., et al., The Selong Section, Candidate of the Global Stratotype Section and Point of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, in Palaeozoic-Mesozoic Boundary: Candidates of the Global Stratotype Section and Point of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Wuhan: China Univ. Geosci., 1996, pp. 127-137.
14. Kapoor, H.M., Permo-Triassic Boundary of the Indian Subcontinent and Its Intercontinental Correlation, in Permo-Triassic Events in the Eastern Tethys: Stratigraphy, Classification, and Relation with the Western Tethys, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ., 1992, pp. 21-36.
15. Kapoor, H.M., The Guryul Ravine Section, Candidate of the Global Stratotype Section and Point of the Permo-Triassic Boundary, in Palaeozoic-Mesozoic Boundary: Candidates of the Global Stratotype Section and Point of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Wuhan: China Univ. Geosci., 1997, pp. 99-110.
16. Kotlyar, G.V., Zakharov, Yu.D., Kochirkevich, B.V., et al., Pozdnepermskii etap evolyutsii organicheskogo mira: Dzhul'finskii i dorashamskii yarusy SSSR (Late Permian Stage of the Organic World Evolution: Dzhulfian and Dorashamian Stages of the USSR), Leningrad: Nauka, 1984.
17. Kozur, H., The Permian-Triassic Boundary in Marine and Continental Sediments, Zentralbl. Geol. Palaontol., 1989, nos. 11-12, pp. 1245-1277.
18. Kozur, H., The Permian-Triassic Boundary and Possible Causes of the Faunal Change near P-T Boundary, Permophiles, 1994, no. 24, pp. 51-54.
19. Kozur, H., Leven, E.Ya., Lozovskii, V.R., and Pyatakova, M.V., Conodont-Based Subdivision of the Permian-Triassic Boundary Beds of the Transcaucasia, Byull. Mask. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 1978, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 15-24.
20. Kozur, H., Ramovs, A., Wang, Ch., and Zakharov, Yu. D., The Importance of Hindeodus parvus (Conodonta) for the Defintion of the Permian-Triassic Boundary and Evaluation of the Proposed Sections for a Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Base of the Triassic, Geologija, 1996, vol. 37-38, pp. 173-213.
21. Kummel, B., Ammonoids from the Kathwai Member, Mianwali Formation, Salt Range, West Pakistan, in Stratigraphic Boundary Problems: Permian and Triassic of West Pakistan, Lawrence: Kansas Univ., 1970, pp. 177-192.
22. Kummel, B., The Lower Triassic (Scythian) Ammonoid Otoceras, Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool. Harvard Univ., 1972, vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 365-418.
23. Kummel, B. and Teichert, C., Relations between the Permian and Triassic Formations in the Salt Range and Trans-Indus Ranges, West Pakistan, Neues Jahrb. Geol. Palaontol. Abh., 1966, vol. 125, pp. 297-333.
24. Kummel, B. and Teichert, C., Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Permian-Triassic Boundary Beds, Salt Range and Trans-Indus Ranges, West Pakistan, in Stratigraphic Boundary Problems: Permian and Triassic of West Pakistan, Lawrence: Kansas Univ., 1970, pp. 1-110.
25. Lai, X., Yang, F., Hallam, A., and Wignall, P.B., The Shangsi Section, Candidate of the Global Stratotype Section and Point of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, in Palaeozoic-Mesozoic Boundary: Candidates of the Global Stratotype Section and Point of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Wuhan: China Univ. Geosci., 1996, pp. 113-124.
26. Li, Z., Zhan, L., Dai, J., et al., Study on the Permian-Triassic Biostratigraphy and Event Stratigraphy of Northern Sichuan and Southern Shangsi, Beijing: Geol. Publ. House, 1989.
27. Nakazawa, K., Analysis of the Late Permian and Early Triassic Faunas of Kashmir, Mem. Geol. Surv. India, 1981, vol. 46, pp. 191-204.
28. Nakazawa, K., Stratigraphy of the Permian-Triassic Transition and the Paleozoic-Mesozoic Boundary, Bull. Geol. Surv. Jpn., 1993, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 425-445.
29. Nakazawa, K. and Kapoor, H.M., The Upper Permian and Lower Triassic Faunas of Kashmir, Palaeontol. Ind. New Ser, 1981, vol. 46, pp. 1-204.
30. Nakazawa, K., Bando, Yu., and Matsuda, T., The Otoceras woodwardi Zone and the Time Gap at the Permian-Triassic Boundary in East Asia, in Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia, Tokyo: Tokyo Univ., 1980, vol. 21, pp. 75-90.
31. Nakazawa, K., Kapoor, H.M., Ishii, K., et al., The Upper Permian and the Lower Triassic in Kashmir, India, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ. Ser. Geol. Mineral., 1975, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1-106.
32. Newell, N.D., The Paleozoic-Mesozoic Erathem Boundary, Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 1988, vol. 34, pp. 303-311.
33. Noetling, F., Die Otoceras Beds in Indien, Zentralbl. Miner., Geol. Palaontol., 1900, pp. 216-217.
34. Noetling, F., Über Medlicottia Waag. und Episageceras n.. g. aus den Permischen und Triadischen Schichten Indiens, Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Geol. Palaontol., 1904, vol. 19, pp. 334-376.
35. Pakistani-Japanese Research Group. Permian and Triassic Systems in the Salt Range and Surghar Range, Pakistan, in The Tethys: Her Paleogeography and Paleobiogeography from Paleozoic to Mesozoic, Tokyo: Tokai Univ., 1985, pp. 221-312.
36. Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A., Hindeodus parvus Is Proposed Index Fossil for the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Lethaia, 1994, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 271-272.
37. Scotese, C.R. and McKerrow, W.S., Revised World Maps and Introduction, Mem. Geol. Soc. London, 1990, vol. 12, pp. 1-21.
38. Sheng, J., Chen, Ch., Wang, Y., et al., Permian-Triassic Boundary in Middle and Eastern Tethys, J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ., Ser. 4, 1984, vol. 21, pp. 133-181.
39. Shevyrev, A.A., Ammonoidei i khronostratigrafiya triasa (Ammonoids and the Triassic Chronostratigraphy), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.
40. Sokratov, B.G., The Lowermost Triassic Beds and the Permian-Triassic Boundary in the Caucasus and Middle East, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geol., 1982, no. 3, pp. 65-79.
41. Spath, L.F., The Ammonoidea of the Trias, in Catalogue of the Fossil Cephalopoda in the British Museum (Natural History), London, 1934, vol. 4.
42. Stepanov, D.L., Golshani, F., and Stöcklin, J., Upper Permian and Permian-Triassic- Boundary in North Iran, Rep. Geol. Surv. Iran, 1969, no. 12, pp. 1-72.
43. Taraz, H., Permo-Triassic Section in Central Iran, Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., 1969, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 688-693.
44. Taraz, H., Uppermost Permian and Permo-Triassic Transition Beds in Central Iran, Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., 1971, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1280-1294.
45. Teichert, C., Kummel, B., and Sweet, W., Permian-Triassic Strata, Kuh-E-Ali Bashi, North-Western Iran, Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool., Harvard Univ., 1973, vol. 145, no. 8, pp. 359-472.
46. Tozer, E.T., Definition of the Permian-Triassic (P-T) Boundary: the Question of the Age of the Otoceras Beds, Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 1988, vol. 34, pp. 291-301.
47. Tozer, E.T., Age and Correlation of the Otoceras Beds at the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Albertiana, 1994, no. 14, pp. 31-37.
48. Wang, Ch., Conodonts of Permian-Triassic Boundary Beds and Biostratigraphic Boundary, Acta Palaeonfol. Sin., 1995, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 129-151.
49. Wang, Y., Chen, Ch., and Rui, L., A Potential Global Stratotype of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Permophiles, 1988, no. 13, pp. 3-7.
50. Waterhouse, J.B., Chronostratigraphy for the World Permian, in Contribution to Geological Time Scale, Tulsa, 1978, pp. 299-322.
51. Yang, Z., Yang, F., and Wu, Sh., The Ammonoid Hypophiceras Fauna near the Permian-Triassic Boundary at Meishan Section and in South China: Stratigraphic Significance, in Palaeozoic-Mesozoic Boundary: Candidates of the Global Stratotype Section and Point of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Wuhan: China Univ. Geosci., 1996, pp. 49-56.
52. Yang, Z., Yin, H., Wu, Sh., et al., Permian-Triassic Boundary Stratigraphy and Fauna of South China, Beijing: Geol. Publ. House, 1987.
53. Yin, H., On the Transitional Bed and the Permian-Triassic Boundary in South China, Newslett. Stratigr., 1985, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 13-27.
54. Yin, H., A Proposal for the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Albertiana, 1993, no. 11, pp. 4-30.
55. Yin, H., Wu, Sh., Din, M., et al., The Meishan Section, Candidate of the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) Of the Permian-Triassic Boundary (PTB), Albertiana, 1994, no. 14, pp. 15-31.
56. Yin, H., Zhang, K., Wu, Sh., and Peng, Yu., Global Correlation and Definition of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, in Palaeozoic-Mesozoic Boundary: Candidates of the Global Stratotype Section and Point of the Permian-T-riassic Boundary, Wuhan: China Univ., 1996, pp. 3-28.
57. Zakharov, Yu.D., On the Type of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 1985, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 59-70.
58. Zakharov, Yu.D., Type and Hypotype of the Permian-Triassic Boundary, Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital., 1988, vol. 34, pp. 277-289.
59. Zakharov, Yu.D. and Rybalka, S.V., Permian and Triassic Standards in the Tethyan Region, in Problemy biostratigrafii permi i triasa Vostoka SSSR (Problems of the Permian and Triassic Biostratigraphy of the Eastern USSR), Vladivostok: Dal'nevost. Nauch. Tsentr Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1987, pp. 6-48.