The centre for evaluation studies at the university of Huddersfield: A profile

Research on Social Work Practice

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 104-116

  Kazi, Mansoor A F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944487046     PISSN: 10497315     EISSN: 15527581     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104973159600600110     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Audit Commission. (1992). The community revolution: Personal services and community care. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
2. Blythe, B.J., & Tripodi, T. (1989). Measurement in direct practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Bostwick, G.J., Jr., & Kyte, N.S. (1993). Measurement in research In R. M. Grinnell, Jr. (Ed.), Social work research and evaluation (4th ed., pp. 174-197). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
4. Brennan, J. (Ed.). (1992). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. Aldershot, England: Avebury.
5. Central Council for the Education and Training of Social Workers. (1989). Requirements and regulations for the diploma in social work (Paper No. 30). London: Author.
6. Cheetham, J., Fuller, R., McIvor, G., & Petch, A. (1992). Evaluating social work effectiveness Buckingham: Open University Press.
7. Effective health care. (March, 1992, No. 2). A bulletin on the effectiveness of health service interventions for decision makers. University of Leeds, School of Public Health; University of York, Centre for Health Economics; Royal College of Physicians, Research Unit.
8. Fuller, R., & Lovelock, R. (1987). Approaches to social work evaluation British Journal of Social Work, 17, 685-693.
9. Goldberg, G., & Berger, G.G. (1988). Secondary prevention in stroke: Primary rehabilitation concern Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 32-40.
10. Heineman-Peiper, M. (1985). The future of social work research Social Work Research and Abstracts, 21, 3-11.
11. Herman, J.L., Morris, L.L., & Fitz-Gibbon, C.L. (1987). Evaluator's handbook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Jenkins, S. (1987). The limited domain of effectiveness research British Journal of Social Work, 17, 58.
13. Kazi, M.A.R. (1994a, November). Single-case evaluation in improving services. Paper presented at the Association of Directors of Social Services Autumn Research Conference, Stafford, England.
14. Kazi, M.A.F. (1994b, December). Single-case evaluation in the public sector. Paper presented at the European Evaluation Society Conference on Evaluation, The Netherlands Conference Centre, The Hague.
15. Kazi, M.A.F., & Wilson, J. (1993). Applying outcome measures in direct client services. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield, Centre for Evaluation Studies.
16. Kazi, M.A.F., & Wilson, J.T. (1996). Applying single-case evaluation methodology in a British social work agency Research on Social Work Practice, 6, 5-26.
17. National Children's Home. (1992). The report of the committee of enquiry into children and young people who sexually abuse other children. London: Author.
18. Nelsen, J.C. (1981). Issues in single-subject research for the nonbehaviorists Social Work Research and Abstracts, 17, 31-37.
19. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Raynor, P. (1984). Evaluation with one eye closed: The empiricist agenda in social work research British Journal of Social Work, 14, 1-10.
21. Robinson, E.A.R., Bronson, D.E., & Blythe, B.J. (1988). An analysis of the implementation of single-case evaluation by practitioners Social Service Review, 62, 285-301.
22. Robson, C. (1993). Real work research Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Ruckdeschel, R.A., & Farris, B.E. (1981). Assessing practice: A critical look at the single-case design Social Casework, 62, 413-419.
24. Sheldon, B. (1982). Behaviour modification. London: Tavistock.
25. Sheldon, B. (1984a). Single case evaluation methods In J. Lishman (Ed.), Evaluation: Research highlights (pp. 47-67). London: Jessica Kingsley.
26. Sheldon, B. (1984b). Evaluation with one eye closed: The empiricist agenda in social work research-A reply to Peter Raynor British Journal of Social Work, 14, 635-637.
27. Sheldon, B. (1986). Social work effectiveness experiments: Review and implications British Journal of Social Work, 16, 233-242.
28. Smith, D. (1987). The limits of positivism in social work research British Journal of Social Work, 17, 401-416.
29. Smith, G., & Cantley, C. (1988). Pluralistic evaluation In J. Lishman (Ed.), Evaluation: Research highlights (pp. 118-136). London: Jessica Kingsley.
30. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Thomas, E.J. (1978). Research and service in single-case experimentation: Conflicts and choices Social Work Research and Abstracts, 14, 20-32.
32. Thyer, B.A. (1989). First principles of practice research British Journal of Social Work, 19, 309-323.
33. Thyer, B.A. (1993). Single-system research designs In R. N. Grinnell, Jr. (Ed.), Social work research and evaluation (4th ed., pp. 94-117). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
34. World Health Organization. (1989). Stroke-1989: Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and Other Cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke, 20, 1407-1431.