Analysing the within-group agreement: An application to evaluate the culture of work teams;Acuerdo intragrupal: Una aplicación a la evaluatión de la cultura de los equipos de trabajo

Psicothema

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 88-93

  Sánchez, José C ^a   Amo, E Alonso ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944481274     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Alonso, E. (1997). El método del calibrado en la evaluatión de la cullura organizacional. Trabajado prescntado al VI Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social, San Sébastian
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Nueva York: Freeman
3. Bliese, P.D. y Halverson, R.R. (1998). Group consensus and psychological web-being. A large field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 563-580.
4. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
5. DeCarlo, L.T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292-307.
6. Earley, P.C. (1999). Playing follow the leader: Status-determining traits in relation to collective efficacy across cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 192-212.
7. Eby, L.T., Meade, A.W., Parisi, A.G. y Douthitt, S.S. (1999). The development of an individual-level teamwork expectations measure and the ap_plication of a within-group agreement statistic to assess shared expectations for teamwork. Organizational research methods, 2(4), 366-394.
8. Feltz, D.L. y Lirgg, CD. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 557-564.
9. Fleenor, J.W., Fleenor, J.B. y Grossnickle, W.F. (1996). Interrater reliability and agreement of performance ratings: A methodological comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 367-380.
10. Gibson, C.B., Randel, A.E. y Earley, AE. (2000). Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods. Group and Organization Management, 25, 67-97.
11. Gist, M.E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12, 472485.
12. Jackson, J. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. En I.D. Steiner y M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology. Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
13. James, L.R., Demaree, R.J. y Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
14. wg. An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28, 306-309.
15. Kirkman, B.L., Tesluk, P.E. y Rosen, B. (2001). Assessing the incremental validity of team consensus ratings over aggregation of individual level data in predicting team effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 54, 645-667.
16. Klein, K.J., Conn, A.B. Smith, D.B. y Sorra, J.S. (2001). Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1, 3-16.
17. Lindell, M.K. (2001). Assessing and testing interrater agreement on a single target using multi-item rating scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(1), 89-99.
18. Lindell, M.K. y Brandt, C.J. (1999). Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test: A comparison of the CVI, T, Rwg(j), and R*wg indexes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 640-647.
19. Lindell, M.K., Brandt, C.J. y Whitney, D.J. (1999). A revised index of inter-rater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 127-135.
20. Lindell, M.K. y Brandt, C.J. (1997). Measuring inter-rater agreement for ratings of a single target. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 271-278.
21. Lindsley, D.H., Brass, D.J. y Thomas, J.B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678.
22. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Sánchez, J.C. y Alonso, E. (1997). La evaluatión de la cultura: El cuestionario de conductas normativas organiiacionales. Trabajado presentado al VI Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social, San Sebastián.
24. Sánchez, J.C. y Alonso, E. (1998). Análisis de las escalas del cuesthnario de conductas normativas (CNO-2). Trabajo presentado al IV Congreso Nacional de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones. Valladolid.
25. Strealau, J., Angleitner, A., Bantelmann, J. y Ruch, W. (1990). The Strealau temperament inventory-revised (STI-R): Theoretical considerations and scale development. European Journal of Personality, 4, 209-235.