In regard to correspondence between Potter et al. and Nag et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:293-295) [2] (multiple letters)

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 644-645

  Narayan, Kallash ^a   VanDyk, Sylvia ^a   Bernshaw, David L ^a   Nag, Subir ^b   Cardenes, Higinia ^c   Chang, Silvia ^d   Das, Indra J ^e   Ibbott, Geoffrey S ^f   Lowenstein, Jessica ^f   Roll, Joye ^f   Thomadsen, Bruce ^g   Varia, Mahesh ^h   Pötter, Richard ⁱ   Kirisits, Christian ⁱ   Haie Meder, Christine ^j   Van Limbergen, Erik ^k   Erickson, Beth ^l  

^a PETER MACCALLUM CANCER CENTRE   (Australia)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

ⁱ MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^j INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^k UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^l MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED CANCER; BRACHYTHERAPY; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RISK; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; INTESTINE MOTILITY; LETTER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; FEMALE; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; NOTE; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

BRACHYTHERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 24944478225     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.048     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. R. Potter J. Dimopoulos C. Kirisits Recommendations for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer: The GYN GEC-ESTRO Working Group point of view: In regard to Nag et al. (IJROBP 2004;60:1160–1172) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 2005 293 295
2. P.J. Eifel C. Levenback J.T. Wharton Time course and incidence of late complications in patients treated with radiation therapy for FIGO Stage IB carcinoma of the uterine cervix Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32 1995 1289 1300
3. P.J. Eifel J. Moughan B. Erickson Patterns of radiotherapy practice for patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix a patterns of care study Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 2004 1144 1153
4. K. Narayan Arguments for a magnetic resonance imaging–assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 15 2005 1 10
5. C.E. Pelloski M. Palmer G.M. Chronowski Comparison between CT-based volumetric calculations and ICRU reference-point estimates of radiation doses delivered to bladder and rectum during intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 2005 131 137
6. K. Narayan A.F. McKenzie R.J. Hicks Relation between FIGO stage, primary tumor volume, and presence of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients referred for radiotherapy Int J Gynecol Cancer 13 2003 657 663
7. K. Narayan R. Fisher D.L. Bernshaw Significance of tumor volume and corpus uteri invasion in cervical cancer patients treated by radiotherapy Int J Gynecol Cancer 15 2005 573 582
8. S. Nag H. Cardenes S. Chang Proposed guidelines for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma Report from Image-Guided Brachytherapy Working Group Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 2004 1160 1172
9. C. Haie-Meder R. Potter E. Van Limbergen Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I) Concepts and terms in 3D image-based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV Radiother Oncol 74 2005 235 245