The influence of agent delivery mode on cardiomyocyte injury induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1257-1263

  Miller, Douglas L ^a,c   Dou, Chunyan ^a   Armstrong, William F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic cavitation; Contrast media adverse effect; Echocardiography

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; CAVITATION; CELLS; DYES; FLUORESCENCE; STRESSES;

ACOUSTIC CAVITATION; CONTRAST AGENTS; CONTRAST MEDIA ADVERSE EFFECT; INJURIES;

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

DIPYRIDAMOLE; EVANS BLUE;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL KILLING; CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; EXTRASYSTOLE; HEART MUSCLE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; VEIN;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIPYRIDAMOLE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EVANS BLUE; FLUOROCARBONS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MYOCYTES, CARDIAC; RATS; RATS, MUTANT STRAINS;

EID: 24944478188     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. T. Ay, X. Havauz, G. Van Camp Destruction of contrast microbubbles by ultrasound effects on myocardial function, coronary perfusion pressure and microvascular integrity Circulation 104 2001 461 466
2. H. Becher, P.N. Burns Handbook of contrast echocardiography left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion 2000 Springer New York
3. A.C. Borges, T. Walde, R.K. Reibis Does contrast echocardiography with Optison induce myocardial necrosis in humans? J. Am Soc Echocardiogr 15 2002 1080 1086
4. J. Brinker What every cardiologist should know about intravascular contrast Rev Cardiovasc Med 4 Suppl. 5 2003 S19 S27
5. S. Chen, M.H. Kroll, R.V. Shohet Bioeffects of myocardial contrast microbubble destruction by echocardiography Echocardiography 19 2002 495 500
6. N.G. Fisher, J.P. Christiansen, H. Leong-Poi, A.R. Jayaweera, J.R. Lindner, S. Kaul Myocardial and microcirculatory kinetics of BR14, a novel third-generation intravenous ultrasound contrast agent J Am Coll Cardiol 39 2002 530 537
7. B.B. Goldberg, J.S. Raichlen, F. Forsberg Ultrasound contrast agents 2nd ed. 2001 Martin Dunitz Ltd London
8. D.F. Goldspink, J.G. Burniston, G.M. Ellison, W.A. Clark, L.B. Tan Catecholamine-induced apoptosis and necrosis in cardiac and skeletal myocytes of the rat in vivo The same or separate death pathways? Exp Physiol 89 2004 407 416
9. P.W. Hamer, J.M. McGeachie, M.J. Davies, M.D. Grounds Evans blue dye as an in vivo marker of myofibre damage Optimising parameters for detecting initial myofibre membrane permeability J Anat 200 2002 69 79
10. R. Janardhanan, R. Senior Accuracy of dipyridamole myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery and multivessel disease early after acute myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 43 2004 2247 2252
11. B. Kuersten, T.H. Murthy, P. Li Ultraharmonic myocardial contrast imaging In vivo experimental and clinical data from a novel technique J Am Soc Echocardiogr 14 2001 910 916
12. B. Kuersten, T. Nahar, M.A. Vannan Methods of contrast administration for myocardial perfusion imaging Continuous infusion versus bolus injection Am J Cardiol 90 Suppl 2002 35J 37J
13. P. Li, W.R. Armstrong, D.L. Miller Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability Comparison of three different contrast agents Ultrasound Med. Biol 30 2004 83 91
14. P. Li, L.Q. Cao, C.Y. Dou, W.R. Armstrong, D.L. Miller Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability An in vivo dose response study of delivery mode, ultrasound power and contrast dose Ultrasound Med Biol 29 2003 1341 1349
15. J.R. Lindner, J. Song, A.R. Jayaweera, J. Sklenar, S. Kaul Microvascular rheology of Definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15 2002 396 403
16. D.L. Miller, P. Li, W.F. Armstrong The effect of time and of vasoactive drugs on capillary leakage induced during myocardial contrast echocardiography Echocardiography 21 2004 125 132
17. D.L. Miller, P. Li, C. Dou, D. Gordon, C.E. Edwards, W.F. Armstrong Influence of contrast dose and ultrasound exposure on cardiomyocyte injury induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats Radiology 2005 (in press)
18. D.L. Miller, P. Li, D. Gordon, W.F. Armstrong Histological characterization of micro-lesions induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography Echocardiography 22 2005 25 34
19. S.L. Mulvagh, A.N. DeMaria, S.B. Feinstein Contrast echocardiography Current and future applications J Am Soc Echocardiogr 13 2000 331 342
20. W.L. Nyborg, P.L. Carson, E.L. Carstensen Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: II. Criteria based on all known mechanisms. Report no. 140 2002 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Bethesda, MD
21. F.G. Shellock, E. Kanal Safety of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents J Magn Reson Imaging 10 1999 477 484
22. P. Van der Wouw, A.C. Brauns, S.E. Barlew Premature ventricular contractions during triggered imaging with ultrasound contrast J Am Soc Echocardiogr 13 2000 288 294
23. K. Wei, A.R. Jayaweera, S. Firoozan Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion Circulation 97 1998 473 483