A kinematic source-time function compatible with earthquake dynamics

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1211-1223

  Tinti, Elisa ^a   Fukuyama, Eiichi ^b   Piatanesi, Alessio ^a   Cocco, Massimo ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI GEOFISICA E VULCANOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR EARTH SCIENCE AND DISASTER PREVENTION   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; EARTHQUAKES; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEISMIC WAVES;

EARTHQUAKE DYNAMICS; KINEMATIC SLIP MODELS; PEAK SLIP VELOCITY; SLIP DURATION;

SEISMOLOGY;

EARTHQUAKE; FOCAL MECHANISM; SOURCE PARAMETERS;

EID: 24944465366     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120040177     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andrews, D. J. (1999). Test of two methods for faulting in finite-difference calculations, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 931-937.
2. Beresnev, I. A. (2003). Uncertainties in finite-fault slip inversions: to what extent to believe? (A critical review), Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 2445-2458.
3. Beroza, G. C., and P. Spudich (1988). Linearized inversion for fault rupture behavior: application to the 1984 Morgan Hill, California, earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 6275-6296.
4. Bizzarri, A., and M. Cocco (2003). Slip-weakening behavior during the propagation of dynamic ruptures obeying rate- and state-dependent friction laws, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2373, doi:10.1029/2002 JB002198.
5. Bouchon, M. (1997). The state of stress on some faults of the San Andreas system as inferred from near-field strong motion data, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 11,731-11,744.
6. Bouchon, M., N. Toksoz, H. Karabulut, M.-P. Bouin, M. Dietrich, M. Akter, and M. Edie (2000). Seismic imaging of the 1999 Izumit (Turkey) rupture inferred from the near-fault recordings, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 3013-3016.
7. Broberg, K. (1978). On transient sliding motion, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 52, 397-432.
8. Broberg, K. (1999). Cracks and Fracture, Academic Press, New York.
9. Cocco, M., A. Bizzarri, and E. Tinti (2004). Physical interpretation of the breakdown process using a rate- and state-dependent friction law, Tectonophysics 378, 241-262.
10. Cohee, B. P., and G. C. Beroza (1994). A comparison of two methods for earthquake source inversion using strong motion seismograms, Ann. Geophys. 37, 1515-1538.
11. Cotton, F., and M. Campillo (1995). Frequency domain inversion of strong motions: application to the 1992 Landers earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 3961-3976.
12. Das, S., and K. Aki (1977). A numerical study of two-dimensional spontaneous rupture propagation, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 50, 643-668.
13. Day, S. (1982). Three-dimensional finite-difference simulation of fault dynamics: rectangular faults with fixed rupture velocity, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 705-727.
14. Freund, L. B. (1979). The mechanics of dynamic shear crack propagation, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2199-2209.
15. Fukuyama, E., and K. Irikura (1986). Rupture process of the 1983 Japan Sea (Akita-Oki) earthquake using a waveform inversion method, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 76, 1623-1649.
16. Fukuyama, E., and R. Madariaga (1998). Rupture dynamics of a planar fault in a 3D elastic medium: rate- and slip-weakening friction, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 1-17.
17. Fukuyama, E., and T. Mikumo (1993). Dynamic rupture analysis: inversion for the source process of the 1990 Izu-Oshima, Japan, earthquake (M = 6.5), J. Geophys. Res. 98, 6529-6542.
18. Guatteri, M., P. M. Mai, G. C. Beroza, and J. Boatwright (2003). Strong ground-motion prediction from stochastic-dynamic source models, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 301-313.
19. Hartzell, S. H., and T. H. Heaton (1983). Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1553-1583.
20. Heaton, T. H. (1990). Evidence for and implication of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 64, 1-20.
21. Hisada, Y. (2000). A theoretical omega-square model considering the spatial variation on slip and rupture velocity, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 387-400.
22. Hisada, Y. (2001). A theoretical omega-square model considering the spatial variation on slip and rupture velocity. II. Case for a two-dimensional source model, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 651-666.
23. Ide, S., and M. Takeo (1997). Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic wave analysis, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 27,379-27,391.
24. w 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 1266-1280.
25. Kostrov, B. V. (1964). Self-similar problems of propagation of shear cracks, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 28, 1077-1087.
26. Liu, P., and R. J. Archuleta (2004). A new nonlinear finite fault inversion with three-dimensional Green's functions: application to the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 109, 2318, doi:10.1029/2003JB002625.
27. Mikumo, T., K. B. Olsen, E. Fukuyama, and Y. Yagi (2003). Stress-breakdown time and slip-weakening distance inferred from slip-velocity functions on earthquake faults, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 264-282.
28. Nakamura, H., and T. Miyatake (2000). An approximate expression of slip velocity time functions for simulation of near-field strong ground motion, Zishin (J. Seism. Soc. Jpn.) 53, 1-9 (in Japanese with English abstract).
29. Nielsen, S., and J. M. Carlson (2000). Rupture pulse characterization: self-healing, self-similar, expanding solutions in a continuum model of fault dynamics, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 1480-1497.
30. Nielsen, S., and R. Madariaga (2003). On the self-healing fracture mode, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 2375-2388.
31. Ohnaka, M., and T. Yamashita (1989). A cohesive zone model for dynamic shear faulting based on experimentally inferred constitutive relation and strong motion source parameters, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 4089-4104.
32. Piatanesi, A., E. Tinti, M. Cocco, and E. Fukuyama (2004). The dependence of traction evolution on the earthquake source time function adopted in kinematic rupture models, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L04609, doi: 10.1029/2003GL019225.
33. Sekiguchi, H., and T. Iwata (2002). Rupture process of the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake estimated from strong-motion waveforms, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 300-311.
34. Takeo, M. (1987). An inversion method to analyse the rupture process of earthquakes using near-field seismograms, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 490-513.
35. Tinti, E., A. Bizzarri, A. Piatanesi, and M. Cocco (2004). Estimates of slip weakening distance for different dynamic rupture models, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L02611, doi:10.1029/2003GL018811.
36. Wald, D. J., and T. H. Heaton (1994). Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 668-691.
37. Yagi, Y., and M. Kikuchi (2000). Source rupture process of the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999, obtained by joint inversion of near-field data and teleseismic data, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 1969-1972.
38. Yoffe, E. (1951). The moving Griffith crack, Phil. Mag. 42, 739-750.
39. Yoshida, S., and K. Koketsu (1990). Simultaneous inversion of waveform and geodetic data for the rupture process of the 1984 Naganoken-Seibu, Japan, earthquake, Geophys. J. Int. 103, 355-362.
40. Yoshida, S., K. Koketsu, B. Shibazaki, T. Sagiya, T. Kato, and Y. Yoshida (1996). Joint inversion of near- and far-field waveforms and geodetic data for the rupture process of the 1995 Kobe earthquake, J. Phys. Earth 44, 437-454.
41. Zheng, G., and J. R. Rice (1998). Conditions under which velocity-weakening friction allows a self-healing versus a crack-like mode of rupture Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 1466-1483.