Cytological grading of breast carcinoma with histological correlation

Journal of B.U.ON.

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 251-256

  Jovicić Milentijević, Maja ^a,b   Ilic R ^a   Milentijevic I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NI   (Serbia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma; Fine needle aspiration cytology; Grading

Indexed keywords

APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CYTOLOGY; CYTOPLASM; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; GIEMSA STAIN; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MITOSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NECROSIS; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATIENT SELECTION;

EID: 24944456618     PISSN: 11070625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Millis RR, Hanby AM, Oberman HA. The breast. In: Stenberg SS (ed): Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1999, pp 319-385.
2. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Method for grading breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46: 189-190.
3. Oykara SK, Ustun MO, Paksoy N. The gray zone in breast fine needle aspiration cytology. How to report on it? Acta Cytol 2003; 46: 513-518.
4. Hunt CM, Ellis IO, Elston CW et al. Cytological grading of breast carcinoma - a feasible proposition. Cytopathology 1990; 1: 287-295.
5. Tahlan A, Nijhawan R, Joshi K. Grading of ductal breast carcinoma by cytomorphology and image morphometry with histologic correlation. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2000; 22: 193-198.
6. Mapstone NP, Zakhor HD. Morphometric analysis of fine needle aspirates from breast lesions. Cytopathology 1990; 1: 349-355.
7. Wolberg WH, Street WN, Mangasarin OL. Computer-derived nuclear features compared with axillary lymph node status for breast carcinoma prognosis. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 1997; 81: 172-179.
8. Cross SS, Bury JP, Stephenson TJ et al. Image analysis of low magnification images of fine needle aspirates of the breast produces useful discrimination between benign and malignant cases. Cytopathology 1997; 8: 265-273.
9. Mouriquand J, Gozlan-Fior M, Villemain D et al. Value of cytoprognostic classification in breast carcinomas. J Clin Pathol 1986; 39: 489-496.
10. Thomas J, Mallon EA, George WD. Semiquantitative analysis of fine needle aspirates from benign and malignant breast lesions. J Clin Pathol 1989; 42: 28-34.
11. Taniguchi E, Yang Q, Tang W et al. Cytologic grading of invasive breast carcinoma. Correlation with clinicopathologic variables and predictive value of nodal metastasis. Acta Cytol 2000; 44: 587-591.
12. Kalogeraki A, Thymiolakis D, Kozoni V et al. Nuclear grading in invasive ductal breast carcinomas. CDP 2000; 24: 224-227.
13. Howell LP, Gandour-Edwards R, O'Sullivan D. Application of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson tumor grading system to fine needle aspirates of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 101: 262-265.
14. Nijhawan R, Hemachandran M, Joshi K. Apoptosis in breast cancer. Acta Cytol 2003; 47: 193-196.
15. Wallegren A, Silversward C, Yajicek J. Evaluation of needle aspirates and tissue sections as prognostic factors in mammary carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1976; 20: 313-318.
16. Bodis S, Siziopikou K, Schnitt S et al. Extensive apoptosis in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 1996; 77: 1831-1835.
17. Skrbinc B, Babic A, Cufer T et al. Cytological grading of breast cancer in Giemsa-stained fine needle aspiration smears. Cytopathology 2001; 12: 15-25.