Psychometric data for teacher judgments regarding the learning behaviors of primary grade children

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 235-244

  Crosby, Edward G ^a   French, Joseph L ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944456392     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.10034     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alexander, K.L., Entwisle, D.R., & Dauber, S.L. (1993). First-grade classroom behavior: Its short- and long-term consequences for school performance. Child Development, 64, 801-814.
2. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Bracey, G.W. (1997). Money matters: No it doesn't, yes it does. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 162-164.
4. Byron, L.D. (1995). A reliability and validity study of the Classroom Performance Profile. Unpublished manuscript. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
5. Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
6. Cobb, J.A. (1972). Relationship of discrete classroom behaviors to fourth-grade academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 74-80.
7. Crosby, E.G. (1997). The reliability and validity of using the Classroom Performance Profile with third grade regular education students from the local HSPSECT study. Unpublished manuscript, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
8. Department of Health and Human Services. (1991). Availability of FY 1991 funds and request for applications; Head Start/Public School early childhood transition demonstration projects. Federal Register, 56, 31818-31830.
9. Finn, J.D., Pannozzo, G.M, & Voelkl, K.E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 421-434.
10. French, J.L. (1999). Classroom Performance Profile. University Park, PA: Department of Educational and School Psychology and Special Education, The Pennsylvania State University.
11. French, J.L. (2001). Pictorial Test of Intelligence - Second Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
12. Goldstein, S. (1995). Understanding and managing children's classroom behavior. New York: John Wiley.
13. Gresham, F.M., & Elliott, S.N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14. Gresham, F.M., MacMillan, D.L., & Bocian, K.M. (1997). Teachers as "tests": Differential validity of teacher judgments in identifying students at-risk for learning difficulties. School Psychology Review, 26, 47-60.
15. Hoge, R.D. (1983). Psychometric properties of teacher-judgment measures of pupil aptitudes, classroom behaviors, and achievement levels. Journal of Special Education, 17, 401-429.
16. Hoge, R.D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297-313.
17. Hoge, R.D., & Cudmore, L. (1986). The use of teacher-judgment measures in the identification of gifted pupils. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 181-196.
18. Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
19. Lewis, A.C. (1996). Breaking out of the cycle of poverty. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 186-187.
20. McKinney, J.D., Mason, J., Perkerson, K., & Clifford, M. (1975). Relationship between classroom behavior and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 198-203.
21. Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Pardini, P. (1997). Report card reform. School Administrator, 54(11), 19-20.
23. Patterson, D.S. (1997). An exploration of the reliability and validity of teacher achievement-related behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
24. Perkins, H.V. (1965). Classroom behavior and underachievement. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 1-12.
25. Roberts, M.L. (1995). Best practices in assessing environmental factors that impact student performance. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology - III (pp. 679-688). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists.
26. Robinson, S.L. (1998). Beyond grades: Creating meaningful reporting systems for parents, teachers, and students. Educational Horizons, 77(1), 12-14.
27. Sandoval, J. (1998). Testing in a changing world: An introduction. In J.H. Sandoval, C.L. Frisby, K.F. Geisinger, J.D. Scheuneman, & J.R. Grenier (Eds.). Test interpretation and diversity: Achieving equity in assessment (pp. 3-16). Washington: DC: American Psychological Association.
28. Saracho, O.N. (1991). Teacher expectations of students' performance: A review of the research. Early Childhood Development and Care, 76, 27-41.
29. Sattler, J.M. (1992). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
30. Shafer, S. (1999). Strategies for writing report-card comments that get high marks with parents and kids. Creative Classroom, 15(3), 54, 59.
31. Shapiro, E.S., & Cole, C.L. (1994). Behavior change in the classroom: Self-management interventions. New York: Guilford.
32. Soli, S.D., & Devine, V.T. (1976). Behavioral correlates of achievement: A look at high and low achievers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 335-341.
33. Velicer, W.F., Eaton, C.A., & Fava, J.L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In R.D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41-71). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Wasson, B.B., Beare, P.L., & Wasson, J.B. (1990). Classroom behavior of good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 162-165.
35. Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
36. Zwick, W.R., & Velicer, W.F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.