Experimental evidence for female choice and energetic costs of male tail elongation in red-collared widowbirds

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 35-43

  Pryke, Sarah R ^a,b   Andersson, Staffan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Euplectes ardens; Male choice; Male quality; Sexual selection; Tail length

Indexed keywords

FEMALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; PASSERINE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

EUPLECTES ARDENS;

EID: 24944455959     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00522.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aebischer A, Perrin N, Kreg M, Studer J, Meyer DR. 1996. The role of territory choice, mate choice and arrival date on breeding success in the Savi's warbler Locustella savinioides. Journal of Avian Biology 27: 143-152.
2. Andersson M. 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299: 818-820.
3. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Andersson S. 1992a. Female preference for long tails in lekking Jackson's widowbirds: experimental evidence. Animal Behaviour 43: 379-388.
5. Andersson S. 1992b. Lek mating and sexual selection in Jackson's widowbird (Euplectes jacksoni). DPhil Thesis, Göteborg University.
6. Andersson S. 1994. Costs of sexual advertising in the lekking Jackson's widowbird Euplectes jacksoni. Auk 96: 1-10.
7. Andersson S. 2000. Efficacy and content in avian colour signals. In: Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenqvist G, eds. Adaptive significance of signalling and signal design in animal communication. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press, 47-60.
8. Andersson S, Pryke SR, Örnborg J, Lawes MJ, Andersson M. 2002. Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird. American Naturalist 160: 683-691.
9. Balmford A, Thomas ALR, Jones IL. 1993. Aerodynamics and the evolution of long tails in birds. Nature 361: 628-631.
10. Barnard P. 1990. Male tail length, sexual display intensity and female sexual response in a parasitic African finch. Animal Behaviour 39: 652-656.
11. Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A. 1996. Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58: 385-399.
12. Craig AJFK. 1982. Mate attraction and breeding success in the Red Bishop. Ostrich 53: 246-248.
13. Eckert CG, Weatherhead PJ. 1987. Competition for territories in red-winged blackbirds: is resource-holding potential realized? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20: 309-375.
14. ESRI. 1996. Arcview GIS 3.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
15. Evans MR. 1991. The size of adornments of male scarlet-tufted malachite sunbirds varies with environmental conditions, as predicted by handicap theories. Animal Behaviour 42: 797-803.
16. Evans MR, Hatchwell BJ. 1992. An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird. II. The role of the elongated tail in mate choice and experimental evidence for a handicap. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29: 421-427.
17. Evans MR, Thomas ALR. 1992. The aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: measuring the cost of a handicap. Animal Behaviour 43: 337-347
18. Fitzpatrick S. 1998. Birds' tails as signaling devices: markings, shape, length, and feather quality. American Naturalist 151: 157-173.
19. Grafen A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology 144: 517-546.
20. Guilford T, Dawkins AS. 1991. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Animal Behaviour 42: 1-14.
21. Höglund J, Sheldon BC. 1998. The cost of reproduction and sexual selection. Oikos 83: 478-483.
22. Johnstone RA. 1995. Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 70: 1-65.
23. Ligon JD. 1999. The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Møller AP. 1988. Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 332: 640-642.
25. Norberg UM. 1990. Vertebrate flight. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
26. Norberg UM. 1995. How a long tail and changes in mass and wing shape affect the cost for flight in animals. Functional Ecology 9: 48-54.
27. Nur N, Hasson O. 1984. Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. Journal of Theoretical Biology 10: 275-295.
28. Pryke SR, Andersson S. 2002. A generalized female bias for long tails in a short-tailed widowbird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269: 2141-2146.
29. Pryke SR, Andersson S, Lawes MJ. 2001a. Sexual selection of multiple handicaps in the red-collared widowbird: female choice of tail length but not carotenoid display. Evolution 55: 1452-1463.
30. Pryke SR, Andersson S, Lawes MJ, Piper SE. 2002. Carotenoid status signaling in captive and wild red-collared widowbirds: independent effects of badge size and colour. Behavioral Ecology 13: 622-631.
31. Pryke SR, Lawes MJ, Andersson S. 2001b. Agonistic carotenoid signalling in male red-collared widowbirds: aggression related to the colour signal of both territory owner and model intruder. Animal Behaviour 62: 695-704.
32. Rintamäki PT, Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A. 2001. Correlates of male mating success on black grouse (Tetrao terix L.) leks. Annales Zoologici Fennici 38: 99-109.
33. Savalli UM. 1994. Tail length affects territory ownership in the yellow-shouldered widowbird. Animal Behaviour 48: 105-111.
34. Smith HG, Montgomerie R. 1991. Sexual selection and the tail ornaments of North American barn swallows. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28: 195-201.
35. Thomas ALR. 1993. On the aerodynamics of birds' tails. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 340: 361-380.
36. Thomas ALR, Balmford A. 1995. How natural selection shapes birds tails. American Naturalist 146: 848-868.