Deferred decision making: Patients' reliance on family and physicians for CPR decisions in critical care

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 493-506

  Kim, Su Hyun ^a   Kjervik, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making; Experience of health care treatments; Seriously ill patients

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; DECISION MAKING; DEPRESSION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; FAMILY RELATION; FEMALE; HOSPICE CARE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESUSCITATION; RISK; UNITED STATES;

DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DECISION MAKING; DEPRESSION; FAMILY RELATIONS; FEMALE; HOSPICE CARE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; ODDS RATIO; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESUSCITATION ORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 24944451004     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0969733005ne817oa     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Blackhall LJ, Murphy ST, Frank G, Michel V, Azen S. Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA 1995; 274: 820-25.
2. Furrow BR, Greaney TL, Johnson SH, Jost TS, Schwartz RL. Bioethics: health care law and ethics, fourth edition. St Paul, MN: West Group, 2001.
3. Schneider CE. The practice of autonomy: patients, doctors, and decisions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
4. Schneider CE. The practice of autonomy and the practice of bioethics. J Clin Ethics 2002; 13: 72-77.
5. Terry PB, Vettese M, Song J et al. End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics 1999; 10: 286-93.
6. Sehgal A, Galbraith A, Chesney M, Schoenfeld P, Charles G, Lo B. How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed? JAMA 1992; 267: 59-63.
7. Kelner M. Activists and delegators: elderly patients' preferences about control at the end of life. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 537-45.
8. Puchalski CM, Zhong Z, Jacobs MM et al. Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48(5 suppl): S84-S90.
9. Drought TS, Koenig BA. 'Choice' in end-of-life decision making: researching fact or fiction? Gerontologist 2002; 42 (spec no. 3): 114-28.
10. Lo B, McLeod GA, Saika G. Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146: 1613-15.
11. Dupree CY. The attitudes of black Americans toward advance directives. J Transcult Nurs 2000; 11: 12-18.
12. Frank G, Blackhall LJ, Michel V, Murphy ST, Azen SP, Park K. A discourse of relationships in bioethics: patient autonomy and end-of-life decision making among elderly Korean Americans. Med Anthropol Q 1998; 12: 403-23.
13. Ross LF. Patient autonomy: imperfect, insufficient, but still quite necessary. J Clin Ethics 2002; 13: 57-62.
14. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA 1995; 274: 1591-98.
15. Goodlin SJ, Zhong Z, Lynn J et al. Factors associated with use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in seriously ill hospitalized adults. JAMA 1999; 282: 2333-39.
16. Shacham S. A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States. J Pers Assess 1983; 47: 305-306.
17. Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, Polland A, Dudley WN. A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation. Psychooncology 2002; 11: 273-81.
18. Shacham S, Reinhardt LC, Raubertas RF, Cleeland CS. Emotional states and pain: intraindividual and interindividual measures of association. J Behav Med 1983; 6: 405-19.
19. Katz S. Studies of illness in the aged. JAMA 1963; 185: 914-19.
20. Drageset J. The importance of activities of daily living and social contact for loneliness: a survey among residents in nursing homes. Scand J Caring Sci 2004; 18: 65-71.
21. Klenbaum DG, Kupper, LL, Muller, KE, Nizam A. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, third edition. Boston, MA: PWS-KENT Publishing, 1998.
22. Slomka J. The negotiation of death: clinical decision making at the end of life. Soc Sci Med 1992; 35: 251-59.
23. Lynn J, Teno J, Dresser R et al. Dementia and advance-care planning: perspectives from three countries on ethics and epidemiology. J Clin Ethics 1999; 10: 271-85.
24. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 1992; 47: 1102-14.
25. Singer PA, Martin DK, Lavery JV, Thiel EC, Kelner M, Mendelssohn DC. Reconceptualizing advance care planning from the patient's perspective. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 879-84.
26. Lee MA, Ganzini L. Depression in the elderly: effect on patient attitudes toward life-sustaining therapy. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 983-88.
27. Collins M, Crowley R, Karlawish JH, Casarett DJ. Are depressed patients more likely to share health care decisions with others? J Palliat Med 2004; 7: 527-32.
28. Richards MA, Ramirez AJ, Degner LF, Fallowfield LJ, Maher EJ, Neuberger J. Offering choice of treatment to patients with cancers. A review based on a symposium held at the 10th annual conference of the British Psychosocial Oncology Group, December 1993. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: 112-16.
29. Stiggelbout AM, Kiebert GM. A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making. CMAJ 1997; 157: 383-89.
30. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.