A suggestion for fitting ground-motion attenuation near an extended earthquake source

Seismological Research Letters

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 454-461

  Andrews, D J ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944447944     PISSN: 00128287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.72.4.454     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrahamson, N. A. and W. J. Silva (1997). Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 94-127.
2. Abrahamson, N. A. and R. R. Youngs (1992). A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 82, 505-510.
3. Ambraseys, N. N. and M. Srbulov (1998). A note on the point source approximation in ground motion attenuation relations, J. Earthq. Eng. 2, no. 1.
4. Anderson, J. G., H. Sucuoglu, R. Anooshehpoor, and J. N. Brune (2000). Strong ground motions from the Kocaeli and Duzce, Turkey, earthquakes and possible implications for seismic hazard analysis, Seism. Res. Lett. 71, 222.
5. Andrews, D. J. (1981). A stochastic fault model 2, time dependent case, J. Geophys. Res. 86, 10, 821-10, 834.
6. Boatwright, J. (1982). A dynamic model for far-field acceleration, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 1,049-1,068.
7. Boatwright, J. and L. C. Seekins (1997). Regressing the Response Spectra from the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake for Site Response, Attenuation, and Directivity, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Report 97-858, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
8. Boatwright, J. and L. C. Seekins (2000). Response spectra from the Loma Prieta, California, earthquake regressed for site amplification, attenuation, and directivity, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. (submitted).
9. Boore, D. M. (1983). Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1,865-1,894.
10. Boore, D. M., W. B. Joyner, and T. E. Fumal (1994). Estimation of Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: An Interim Report, Part 2, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 94-127, 40 pp.
11. Boore, D. M., W. B. Joyner, and T. E. Fumal (1997). Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 128-153.
12. Brune, J. N. (1970). Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4,997-5,009.
13. Campbell, K. W. (1997). Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 154-179.
14. Frankel, A. (1991). High-frequency spectral falloff of earthquakes, fractal dimension of complex rupture, b value, and the scaling of strength on faults, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 6,291-6,302.
15. Gusev, A. A. (1983). Descriptive statistical model of earthquake source radiation and its application to an estimation of short-period strong motion, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 74, 787-808.
16. -γ seismic source models: Implications for tectonic stress variations along active crustal fault zones and the estimation of high-frequency strong ground motion, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2,235-2,242.
17. Hanks, T. C. and D. A. Johnson (1976). Geophysical assessment of peak accelerations, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 66, 959-968.
18. Hanks, T. C. and R. K. McGuire (1981). The character of high-frequency strong ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 2,071-2,095.
19. Housner, G. W. (1965). Intensity of earthquake ground shaking near the causative fault, Proc. Third World Conf. on Earthq. Eng. 1, III-94-III-111.
20. Joyner, W. B. (1984). A scaling law for the spectra of large earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74, 1167-1188.
21. Joyner, W. B. and D. M. Boore (1981). Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 2,011-2,038.
22. Mai, P. M. and G. C. Beroza (2000). Source scaling properties from finite-fault-rupture models, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 604-615.
23. Ohno, S., T. Ohta, T. Ikeura, and M. Takemura (1993). Revision of attenuation formula considering the effect of fault size to evaluate strong motion spectra in near field, Tectonophysics 218, 69-81.
24. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery (1992). Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Ed., Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge.
25. Rogers, A. M. and D. M. Perkins (1996). Monte Carlo simulation of peak-acceleration attenuation using a finite-fault uniform-patch model including isochrone and extremal characteristics, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 79-92.
26. Sadigh, K., C.-Y. Chang, J. A. Egan, F. Makdisi, and R. R. Youngs (1997). Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 180-189.
27. Sarma, S. K. (1971). Energy flux of strong earthquakes, Tectonophysics 11, 159-173.
28. Schnabel, P. B. and H. B. Seed (1973). Accelerations in rock for earthquakes in the western United States, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 63, 501-516.
29. Somerville, P. G. (2000). Magnitude scaling, rupture directivity, and basin response issues at the interface between earthquake engineering and seismology, Seism. Res. Lett. 71, 206.
30. Williams, C. S. and O. A. Becklund (1972). Optics: A Short Course for Engineers and Scientists, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida, 397 pp.