Stereoscopic correspondence for ambiguous targets is affected by elevation and fixation distance

Spatial Vision

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 399-411

  Hibbard, Paul B ^a   Bouzit, Samira ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Binocular correspondence; Distance; Elevation; Natural image statistics

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BINOCULAR CORRESPONDENCE; DISTANCE; ELEVATION; NATURAL IMAGE STATISTICS;

BINOCULARS;

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 24944439579     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/1568568054389589     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Burt, P. and Julesz, B. (1980). Modifications of the classical notion of Panum's fusional area, Perception 9, 671-682.
2. Gumming, B. J. and Parker, A. J. (2000a). Local disparity not perceived depth is signalled by binocular neurons in cortical area V1 of the macaque, J. Neurosci. 20, 4758-4767.
3. Gumming, B. J. and Parker, A. J. (2000b). Binocular neurons in V1 of awake monkeys are selective for absolute, not relative disparity, J. Neurosci. 19, 5602-5618.
4. Fleet, D. J., Wagner, H. and Heeger, D. J. (1996). Neural encoding of binocular disparity: Energy model, position shifts and phase shifts, Vision Research 36, 1839-1857.
5. Helmholtz, H. von (1925). Treatise on Physiological Optics, Volume 3, translated from the 3rd German edn, Southall, J. P. C. (Ed.). Optical Society of America, Rochester, NY.
6. Hibbard, P. B. (2005). A statistical model of binocular disparity, Visual Cognition (in press).
7. Julesz, B. (1960). Binocular depth perception of computer generated patterns, Bell Systems Technical Journal 39, 1125-1162.
8. Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
9. Ledgeway, T. and Rogers, B. J. (1999). The effects of eccentricity and vergence angle upon the relative tilt of corresponding vertical and horizontal meridia revealed using the minimum motion paradigm, Perception 28, 143-153.
10. Mammassian, P. and Goutcher, R. (2003). Temporal dynamics in bisatble perception, Perception 32 (Suppl.), 124.
11. Marr, D. and Poggio, T. (1976). Cooperative computation of stereo disparity, Science 194, 283-287.
12. Marr, D. and Poggio, T. (1979). A computational theory of human stereo vision, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series B: Biological Sciences 204, 301-328.
13. McKee, S. M. and Mitchison, G. J. (1988). The role of retinal correspondence in stereoscopic matching, Vision Research 28, 1001-1012.
14. Mitchison, G. J. and McKee, S. P. (1985). Interpolation in stereoscopic matching, Nature 315, 402-404.
15. Mitchison, G. J. and McKee, S. P. (1987). The resolution of ambiguous stereoscopic matches by interpolation, Vision Research 27, 285-294.
16. Ohzawa, I., DeAngelis, G. C. and Freeman, R. D. (1990). Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: Neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors, Science 249, 1037-1041.
17. Prince, S. J. D. and Eagle, R. A. (2000). Weighted directional energy model of human stereo correspondence, Vision Research 40, 1143-1155.
18. Qian, N. (1994). Computing stereo disparity and motion with known binocular properties, Neural Computation 6, 390-404.
19. Read, J. C. A. (2002a). A Bayesian model of stereopsis, depth and motion direction discrimination, Biological Cybernetics 86, 117-136.
20. Read, J. C. A. (2002b). A Bayesian approach to the stereo correspondence problem, Neural Computation 14, 1371-1392.
21. Scharstein, D. and Szeliski, R. (2002). A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms, Intern. J. Computer Vision 47, 7-42.
22. Siderov, J., Harwerth, R. S. and Bedell, H. E. (1999). Stereopsis, cyclovergence and the backwards tilt of the vertical horopter, Vision Research 39, 1347-1357.
23. Smallman, H. S. (1995). Fine-to-coarse scale disambiguation in stereopsis, Vision Research 25, 1047-1060.
24. Thomas, O. M., Cumming, B. G. and Parker, A. J. (2002). A specialisation for relative disparity in V2, Nature Neurosci. 5, 472-478.
25. Tsai, J. J. and Victor, J. D. (2003). Reading a population code: a multi-scale neural model for representing binocular disparity, Vision Research 43, 445-466.
26. Yang, Z. and Purves, D. (2003). A statistical explanation of visual space, Nature Neuroscience 6, 632-640.
27. Zhang, Z., Edwards, M. and Schor, C. M. (2001). Spatial interactions minimize relative disparity between adjacent surfaces, Vision Research 41, 2995-3007.