Self-reinforcing dominance interactions between virtual males and females. Hypothesis generation for primate studies

Adaptive Behavior

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 13-26

  Hemelrijk, Charlotte K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dominance relationships between males and females; Intensity of aggression; Primates; Self reinforcing dominance interactions; Sex ratio; Unidirectionality of attack

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944437726     PISSN: 10597123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105971230000800102     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abernethy, V. (1974). Dominance and sexual beavior: A hypothesis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 813.
2. Barnard, C. J., & Burk, T. E. (1979). Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of 'individual recognition'. Journal of theoretical Biology, 81, 65-73.
3. Bernstein, I. S., & Ehardt, C. L. (1985). Intragroup agonistic behavior in Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). International Journal of Primatology, 6(3), 209-226.
4. Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., & Deneubourg, J. L. (1996). Mathematical models of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies. Bulletin of mathematical biology, 58(4), 661-717.
5. Caldecott, J. O. (1986). Mating patterns, societies and ecogeography of macaques. Animal Behaviour, 34(1), 208-220.
6. Chase, I. D., Bartelomeo, C., & Dugatkin, L. A. (1994). Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning ? Animal Behaviour, 48, 393-400.
7. Copp, N. H. (1986). Dominance hierarchies in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) and the question of learned individual recognition (Decapoda, Astacidea). Crustaceana, 51(1), 9-24.
8. Datta, S. B., & Beauchamp, G. (1991). Effects of group demography on dominance relationships among female primates. I. Mother-daughter and sister-sister relations. American Naturalist, 138, 201-226.
9. Ellis, L. (Ed.). (1994). Reproductive and interpersonal aspects of dominance and status (1st ed.). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
10. Epstein, J. M., Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies. Social science from bottom up. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
11. Goss, S., & Deneubourg, J. L. (1988). Autocatalysis as a source of synchronised rhytmical activity in social insects. Insectes Sociaux, 35(3), 310-315.
12. Hemelrijk, C. K. (1990a). A matrix partial correlation test used in investigations of reciprocity and other social interaction patterns at a group level. Journal of theoretical Biology, 143, 405-420.
13. Hemelrijk, C. K. (1990b). Models of, tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group level. Animal Behaviour, 39, 1013-1029.
14. Hemelrijk, C. K. (1996a). Dominance interactions, spatial dynamics and emergent reciprocity in a virtual world. In P. Maes, M. J. Mataric, J-A Meyer, J Pollack, & S. W. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animals 4: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior (pp. 545-552). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press/Bradford Books.
15. Hemelrijk, C. K. (1996b). Reciprocation in apes: from complex cognition to self-structuring. In W.C. McGrew, L. F. Marchant, & T. Nishida (Eds.), Great ape societies (pp. 185-195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hemelrijk, C. K. (1997). Cooperation without genes, games or cognition. In 4th European Conference on Artificial Life (ed. P. Husbands & I. Harvey), pp. 511-520. Cambridge MA: MIT-Press.
17. Hemelrijk, C. K., Luteijn, M. (1998a). Philopatry, male presence and grooming reciprocation among female primates: a comparative perspective. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42(3), 207-215.
18. Hemelrijk, C. K. (1998b). Hemelrijk, C. K. 1998 Risk sensitive and ambiguity reducing dominance interactions in a virtual laboratory. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior., vol. 5 (ed. R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J-A Meyer & S. W. Wilson), pp. 255-262. Cambridge MA: MIT-Press.
19. Hemelrijk, C. K. (1998c). Spatial centrality of dominants without positional preference. In Artificial Life VI, vol. 6 (ed. C. Adami, R. Belew, H. Kitano & C. Taylor), pp. 307-315. Los Angeles, USA: MIT-Press.
20. Hemelrijk, C. K. (2000). Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Animal Behavior 59, 1035-1048.
21. Hogeweg, P. (1988). MIRROR beyond MIRROR, Puddles of LIFE. In C. Langton (Eds.), Artificial life, SFI studies in the sciences of complexity (pp. 297-316). Redwood City, California: Adisson-Wesley Publishing Company.
22. Hogeweg, P., & Hesper, B. (1979). Heterarchical, selfstructuring simulation systems: concepts and applications in biology. In Zeigler, B. P , Elzas, M. S., Klir, G. J., Oren, T. I.(Eds.), Methodologies in systems modelling and simulation (pp. 221-231). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
23. Hogeweg, P., & Hesper, B. (1983). The ontogeny of interaction structure in bumble bee colonies: a MIRROR model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12, 271-283.
24. Honk, C. v., & Hogeweg, P. (1981). The ontogeny of the social structure in a captive Bombus terestris colony. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 9, 111-119.
25. Hubert, L. J. (1987). Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis (1st ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
26. Judson, O. P. (1994). The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 9-14.
27. Kappeler, P. M. (1993). Female dominance in primates and other mammals. In Bateson, P.P.G., Klopfer, P. H., Thompson, N. S. (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology (pp. 143-158). New York: Plenum Press.
28. Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and evolution of fighting behavior. Journal of theoretical Biology, 47, 223-243.
29. Rosenblum, L. A., Nadler, R. D. (1971). The ontogeny of sexual behavior in male bonnet macaques. In D. H. Ford (Ed.), Influence of hormones on the nervous system. (pp. 388-400). Basel: Karger.
30. Rowell, T. E. (1979). How would we know if social organization were not adaptive? In I.S. Bernstein & E. O. Smith (Eds.), Primate ecology and human origins: ecological influences on social organization (pp. 1-22). New York: Garland STPM Press.
31. Sade, D. S. (1968). Inhibition of son-mother mating among free-ranging rhesus monkeys. In J. H. Masserman (Ed.), Animal and human (pp. 18-38). New York: Grune & Stratton.
32. Siegel, S., Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill international editions.
33. Smuts, B. B. (1987). Gender, aggression and influence. In B.B. Smuts, D.L. Cheney, R.M. Seyfarth, R.W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 400-412). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
34. Villa, F. (1992). New computer architectures as tools for ecological thought. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 179-183.
35. de Waal, F. B. M. & Luttrell, L. M. (1989). Towards a comparative socioecology of the genus Macaca: different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptail monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 19, 83-109.
36. Wrangham, R. & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
37. Yamada, M. 1966 Five natural troops of Japanese monkeys of Shodoshima Island (I): distribution and social organization. Primates, 7, 315-362.