Changing parent roles in school: Effects of a 2-year study of a family literacy program in an urban first-grade classroom

Education and Urban Society

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 108-126

  Nistler, Robert J ^a   Maiers, Angela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS   (United States)

^b DRAKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944434499     PISSN: 00131245     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013124599032001006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Auerbach, E. R. (1989). Toward a social-contextual approach to family literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 59 (2), 165-181.
2. Auerbach, E. R. (1995). Which way for family literacy: Intervention or empowerment? In L. M. Morrow (Ed.), Family literacy connections in schools and communities (pp. 11-28). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3. Baker, E. (1997). Where the power lies: The Colorado experience. In D. Taylor, (Ed.). Many families, many literacies: An international declaration of principles (PP. 83-86). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Epstein, J. (1988). How do we improve programs for parental involvement? Educational Horizons, 66, 55-59.
5. Epstein, J. (1996). Perspectives and previews on research and policy for school, family, and community partnerships. In A. Booth & J. F. Dunn (Eds.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes (pp. 209-246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Hensley, M. (1995). FROM UNTAPPED POTENTIAL TO CREATIVE REALIZATION: EMPOWERING PARENTS. Practicing Anthropology, 17(3) 13-16.
7. James, H. (1993/1994). Language matters. Center for Language in Primary Education (CLPE), 3, 25-28.
8. Kambrelis, G. (1995). Performing classroom community; A dramatic palimpsest of answerability. In K. Hinchman, D. Leu, & C. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice. Forty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 148-160). Chicago: The National Reading Conference.
9. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Lewis, C. (1995). The idealized classroom community: A critique from a performance perspective. In K. Hinchman, D. Leu, & C. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice. Forty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 161-168). Chicago: The National Reading Conference.
11. Lightfoot, S. (1978). Worlds apart: Relationships between families and school. New York: Basic Books.
12. Morrow, L. (1995). Family literacy: Connections in schools and communities. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
13. Neuman, S., Caperelli, J., & Kee, C. (1998). Literacy learning, a family matter. The Reading Teacher, 52(3), 244-252.
14. Paratore, J. R. (1995). Implementing and intergenerational literacy project: Lessons learned. In L. M. Morrow (Ed.), Family literacy (pp. 37-53). New Brunswick, NJ: International Reading Association.
15. Paratore, J., Melzi, G., & Krol-Sinclair, B. (1999). What should we expect of family literacy? Experiences of Latino children whose parents participate in an intergenerational literacy project. Chicago: National Reading Conference; Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16. Routman, R. (1996). Literacy at the crossroads. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Swap, S. M. (1993). Developing home-school partnerships. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Taylor, D. (1998). Booknotes review of Many Families, Many Literacies: An International Deciaration of Principles. Harvard Educational Review, 68(2), 23.
20. Taylor, D., & Dorsey-Gaines, C. (1988). Growing up literate: Learning from inner-city families. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.