Effects of a magnetic appliance in functional Class III patients

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 768-777

  Tuncer, Cumhur ^a   Ũner, Oktay ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Functional Class III; Magnets

Indexed keywords

EID: 24744472094     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Frankel R. Maxillary retrusion in Class III and treatment with the functional corrector. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1970;46:249-259.
2. Jackson GW, Kokich VG, Shapiro PA. Experimental and post experimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemestrine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1979;75:318-333.
3. Nanda R, Hickory W. Zygomaticomaxillary suture adaptations incident to anteriorly directed forces in Rhesus monkeys. Angle Orthod. 1984;54:199-210.
4. Bacetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, Mcnamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:333-343.
5. Deguchi T, McNamara JA Jr. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:175-182.
6. Hägg U, Tse A, Bendeus M, Rabie AB. A follow up study of early treatment of pseudo Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2003;74:465-472.
7. Profitt WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2000:276-277.
8. Blechman AM. Magnetic force systems in orthodontics. Clinical results of a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1985;87:201-210.
9. Darendeliler MA, Chiarini M, Joho JP. Early Class III treatment with magnetic appliances. J Clin Orthod. 1993;27:563-569.
10. Gianelly AA, Vaitas AS, Thomas WM, Berger DG. Distalization of molars with repelling magnets-case report. J Clin Orthod. 1988;22:40-44.
11. Vardimon AD, Graber TM, Voss LR, Verrusio E. Magnetic versus mechanical expansion with different forces. Thresholds and points of force application. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:455-466.
12. Bondemark L, Kurol J, Wisten A. Extent and flux density of static magnetic fields generated by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:488-496.
13. Schopf P. Indication for & frequency of early orthodontic therapy or interceptive measures. J Orofac Orthop. 2003;64:186-200.
14. Kidner G, Dibase A, Dibase D. Class III twin blocks: a case series. J Orthod. 2003;30:197-201.
15. Hägg U, Tse A, Bendeus M, Rabie AB. Long-term follow up of early treatment with reverse headgear. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:95-102.
16. Kapust AJ, Sinclair PM, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of face-mask/expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:204-212.
17. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and post-treatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:404-413.
18. Biren S, Erverdi N. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with Fr-3 appliance. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac. 1993;1:354-360.
19. Firatli S. Frankel'in fonksiyon düzenleyicisi Fr-3′ün Klas III vakalarda ön-arka yöndeki etkilerinin sefalometrik olarak incelenmesi [doctoral thesis]. Istanbul, Turkey: İst.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak; 1991.
20. Kerr WJS, Tenhave TR. Changes in soft tissue profile during the treatment of Class III malocclusion. Br J Orthod. 1987;14:243-249.
21. Kerr WJS, Tenhave TR, McNamara JA Jr. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by function regulator. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:235-242.
22. Loh MK, Kerr WJS. The functional regulator III: effects and indications of use. Br J Orthod. 1985;12:153-157.
23. Ulgen M, Firatli S. The effects of the Frankel's function regulator on the Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:561-567.
24. Miyajima K, McNamara JA, Kimura T, Murata S, Tizuka T. Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:431-438.
25. Deguchi T, Kitsugi A. Stability of changes associated with chin-cup treatment. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:139-146.
26. McNamara JA Jr. An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients. J Clin Orthod. 1987;21:598-608.
27. Ngan P, Wei SHY, Hägg U, Yiu CKY, Merwin D, Stickel B. Effects of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:197-207.
28. Takado K, Petdachai S, Sakuda M. Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by a modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chincup. A longitudinal cephalometric approach. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:211-221.