|
Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 212-217
|
Comparison of two systems of measuring energy expenditure
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CALIBRATION;
CALORIMETRY;
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
ENERGY EXPENDITURE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INDIRECT CALORIMETRY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
METABOLIC RATE;
MICROCOMPUTER;
NORMAL HUMAN;
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RESTING METABOLIC RATE;
BASAL METABOLIC RATE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ENERGY METABOLISM;
INSTRUMENTATION;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
OXIMETRY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARD;
OXYGEN;
ADULT;
AGED;
BASAL METABOLISM;
CALORIMETRY, INDIRECT;
ENERGY METABOLISM;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OXIMETRY;
OXYGEN;
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 24744448728
PISSN: 01486071
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/0148607105029003212 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (52)
|
References (11)
|