Efficacy of fentanyl and esmolol in the prevention of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 454-457

  Hussain, Aziza Mohammad ^a,c   Sultan, Syed Tipu ^b  

^a AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Pakistan)

^b DOW UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Pakistan)

^c Sindhi Muslim Society   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Esmolol; Fentanyl; Haemodynamic response; Laryngoscopy endotracheal intubation

Indexed keywords

ESMOLOL; FENTANYL; PLACEBO; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG ACTIVITY; DRUG EFFICACY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; HEART PROTECTION; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PAKISTAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADRENERGIC BETA-ANTAGONISTS; ADULT; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; BLOOD PRESSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FENTANYL; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PROPANOLAMINES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 24744443344     PISSN: 1022386X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. King BD, Harris LC Jr, Briefenstein FE. Reflex circulatory responses to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation performed during general anaesthesia. Anesthesiology 1951; 12: 556-66.
2. Kleinman B, Henkin RE, Glisson SN, el-Etr AA, Bakhos M, Sullivan HJ, et al. Qualitative evaluation of coronary flow during anesthetic induction using thalium-201 perfusion scans. Anesthesiology 1986; 64: 157-64.
3. Thomson JR. The hemodynamic response to intubation: a perspective. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36: 367-9.
4. Prys Roberts C, Green LT, Meloche R, Foex P. Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension II: Hemodynamic consequences of induction and endotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1971; 43: 531-46.
5. Iyer V, Russell WJ. Induction using fentanyl to suppress the intubation response in the cardiac patient. What is the optimal dose? Anaesth Intensive Care 1988; 16: 411-7.
6. Helfman SM, Gold MI, Delisser EA, Herrington CA. Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation. Lidocaine, fentanyl or esmolol. Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 482-6.
7. Chung F, Evans D. Low dose fentanyl: hemodynamic response during induction and intubation in geriatric patients. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 622-8.
8. Chung K, Sinatra R, Halery J, Paige D, Silverman D. A comparison of fentanyl, esmolol and their combination as anesthetic adjuncts during rapid sequence, induction. Anesthesiology 1991. 75: A 155.
9. Yushi U, Maiko S, Hideyuki H, Kazuhiko W. Fentanyl attenuates the haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation more than the response to laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 233-7.
10. Stocked H, Hengstmann JH, Schuttler J. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl as a possible explanation for recurrence of respiratory depression. Br J Anaesth 1979; 51: 741-5.
11. Me Clain DA, Hug CC Jr. Intravenous fentanyl kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980; 28: 106-14.
12. Kindler CH, Schumacher PG, Schneider MC, Urwyler A. Effects of intravenous lidocaine and/or esmolol on haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: a double blind, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8: 491-6.
13. Cucchiara RF, Benefiel DJ, Matteo RS, Dewood M, Abbin MS. Evaluation of esmolol in controlling increases in heart rate and blood pressure during endotracheal intubation in persons undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiology 1986; 65: 528-31.
14. Tariq S, Aziz A, Waheed A. Attenuation of hemodynamic response to intubation with esmolol. 3rd Saca Congress 1997.
15. Miller DR, Martineau RJ, Wynands JE, Hill J. Bolus administration of esmolol for controlling the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. The Canadian Multicentre Trial. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38: 849-58.