Biological compatibility of polymethyl methacrylate, hydrophilic acrylic and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses

Ophthalmic Research

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 255-261

  Barbour, Walid ^a   Saika, Shizuya ^a   Miyamoto, Takeshi ^a   Ohnishi, Yoshitaka ^a  

^a WAKAYAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Intraocular lenses; Lens epithelial cells; Macrophages monocytes; Rabbits

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID COPOLYMER; BIOMATERIAL; EOSIN; HEMATOXYLIN; PENTOBARBITAL; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASCITES; CELL MATURATION; CRYSTAL; EMULSION; EPITHELIUM CELL; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; LENS IMPLANT; MACROPHAGE; MALE; MICROSCOPY; MONOCYTE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SENESCENCE; STAINING;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; GIANT CELLS; HYDROPHOBICITY; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MACROPHAGES; MONOCYTES; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; RABBITS;

EID: 24744438854     PISSN: 00303747     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000087100     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amon M, Menapace R: In vivo documentation of cellular reactions on lens surfaces for assessing the biocompatibility of different intraocular implants. Eye 1994;8:649-656.
2. Amon M, Menapace R: Cellular invasion on hydrogel and poly(methyl methacrylate) implants. An in vivo study. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:774-779.
3. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG: Surface cytologic features on intraocular lenses: can increased biocompatibility have disadvantages? Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:872-878.
4. Ravalico G, Baccara F, Lovisato A, Tognetto D: Postoperative cellular reaction on various intraocular lens materials. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1084-1091.
5. Yalon M, Blumenthal M, Goldberg EP: Preliminary study of hydrophilic hydrogel intraocular lens implants in cats. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 1984;10:315-317.
6. Bakker D, van Blitterswijk CA, Hesseling SC, Grote JJ: Effect of implantation site on phagocyte/polymer interaction and fibrous capsule formation. Biomaterials 1998;9:14-23.
7. Spector M, Cease C, Tong-Li X: The local tissue response to biomaterials; in Williams DF (ed): Critical Reviews in Biocompatibility. Boca Raton, CRC Press Inc, 1989, vol 5, pp 269-295.
8. Schauersberger J, Amon M, Kruger A, Abela C, Schild G, Kolodjaschna J: Lens epithelial cell outgrowth on 3 types of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:850-854.
9. Turner A, House P: Proliferation of lens epithelial cells on the Acrysof intraocular lens: clinical and histological features of a case. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2001;29:426-428.
10. Miyake K, Asakura M, Kobayashi H: Effect of intraocular lens fixation on the blood-aqueous barrier. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:451-455.
11. Shall SM, Spalton DJ: Changes in anterior chamber flare and cells following cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:91-94.
12. Wenzel M, Reim M, Heinze M, Böcking A: Cellular invasion on the surface of intraocular lenses. In vivo cytological observations following lens implantation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988;226:449-454.
13. Yamanaka A, Kazusa R, Takayama S: Cells on the various kinds of intraocular lens implants. Eur J Implant Refract Surg 1989;1:15-17.
14. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schild G, Schauerberger J, Heinze G, Kruger A: Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:50-61.
15. Kanagawa R, Ohmi S, Tamura M, Uenoyama K: Immunohistochemical study of cellular response on the intraocular lens surface. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1989;33:337-342.
16. Uenoyama K, Kanagawa R, Tamura M, et al: Experimental intraocular lens implantation in the rabbit eye and in mouse peritoneal space. 4. Cell adhesion, fibroblast-like cell, and lymphocytic cluster observed on the implanted lens surface. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989;15:559-566.
17. Ohara K: Biomicroscopy of surface deposits resembling foreign-body giant cells on implanted intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;99:304-311.
18. Vogt A: Lehrbuch und Atlas der Spaltlampen-mikroskopie des lebenden Augus, ed 2. Berlin, Springer, 1930-1931.
19. Shah S, Spalton DJ: Natural history of cellular deposits on the anterior intraocular lens surface. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21:466-471.
20. Wolter JR: Lens implant cytology. Ophthalmic Surg 1982;13:939-942.
21. Ohmi S, Tanaka S, Saika S, Ohnishi Y: Silicone and poly(methyl methacrylate) lens decentration associated with asymmetric capsule shrinkage in rabbits. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1147-1150.
22. Kubota H: Analysis of electrophoretic pattern with CCD camera. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso 1999;44:2013-2018.
23. Uenoyama K, Matoba M, Kanagawa R, et al: Experimental intraocular lens implantation in the rabbit eye and in the mouse peritoneal space. 2. Morphological stages of the macrophage on the implanted lens surface. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988;14:192-196.
24. Uenoyama K, Matoba M, Kanagawa R, et al: Experimental intraocular lens implantation in the rabbit eye and in mouse peritoneal space. 3. Giant cell formation on the implanted lens surface. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988;14:197-201.
25. Hesse Y, Kampeier J, Lang GK, Baldysiak-Figiel A, Lang GE: Adherence and viability of porcine lens epithelial cells on three different IOL materials in vitro. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;241:823-826.
26. Wolter JR: Cytopathology of intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 1985;92:135-142.
27. Fabrizius-Homan DJ, Cooper SL: Competitive adsorption of vitronectin with albumin, fibrinogen, and fibronectin on polymeric biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:953-971.
28. Olivero DK, Furcht LT: Type IV collagen, laminin, and fibronectin promote the adhesion and migration of rabbits lens epithelial cells in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:2825-2834.
29. Daynes T, Spencer TS, Doan K, Mamalis N, Olson RJ: Three-year clinical comparison of 3-piece AcrySof and SI-40 silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1124-1129.
30. Sievers H, von Domarus D: Foreign-body reaction against intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;97:743-751.
31. Wolter JR: Foreign-body giant cells on intraocular lens implants. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1982;219:103-111.
32. Wolter JR: Continuous sheet of lens epithelium on an intraocular lens: pathological confirmation of specular microscope. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993;19:789-792.
33. Versura P, Caramazza R: Ultrastructure of cells cultured onto various intraocular lens materials. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:58-64.
34. Versura P, Torregiani A, Cellini M, Caramazza R: Adhesion mechanisms of human lens epithelial cells on 4 intraocular lens materials. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:527-533.
35. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schauersberger J, Kruger A, Nepp J, Schild G: Results of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1141-1152.