Short dental implants: A literature review and rationale for use

Dentistry Today

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 64-68

  Misch, C E ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIODONTIC DEVICE; REVIEW; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; HUMANS; PERIODONTAL SPLINTS;

EID: 24744432513     PISSN: 87502186     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Misch CE. Divisions of available bone. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1993:125-128.
2. Oikarinen K, Raustia AM, Hartikainen M. General and local contraindications for endosseal implants - an epidemiological orthopantomogram study in 65-year-old subjects. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995;23:114-118.
3. Carlson GE. Bite force and chewing efficiency. In: Kawamura Y, ed. Frontiers in Oral Physiology, Volume 1. Physiology of Mastication. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1974:265-292.
4. Lemons JE, Phillips RW. Biomaterials for dental implants. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1999:259-278.
5. Von Recum A, ed. Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation: Scientific, Technical and Clinical Testing of Implant Materials. New York, NY: MacMillian; 1986.
6. Shigley JE, Mischke CR. Mechanical Engineering Design. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1989:325-370.
7. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Issues in bone mechanics related to oral implants. Implant Dent. 1992(Winter);1:289-294.
8. Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kilicarslan MA, Eskitascioglu G. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:227-234.
9. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan J. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;9:121-132.
10. Lekholm U, Van Steenberghe D, Hermann I, et al. Osseointegratred implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:627-635.
11. Higuchi KW, Folmer T, Kultje C. Implant survival rates in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:264-268.
12. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A six-year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:236-245.
13. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:151-161.
14. Friberg B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U, Branemark PI. Long-term follow-up or severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Bränemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:184-189.
15. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:303-311.
16. Triplett RG, Mason ME, Alfonso WF, McAnear JT. Endosseous cylinder implants in severely atrophic mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:264-269.
17. Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith BJ. A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:179-182.
18. Block MS, Gardiner D, Kent J, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated cylindrical implants in the posterior mandible: 10-year observation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:626-633.
19. ten Bruggenkate CM, Asikainen P, Foitzik C, et al. Short (6-mm) nonsubmerged dental implants: results of a Multicenter clinical trail of 1 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:791-798.
20. Deporter DA, Todescan R, Watson PA, et al. A prospective human clinical trial of Endopore dental implants in restoring the partially edentulous maxilla using fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:527-536.
21. Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:193-200.
22. Saadoun AP, Le Gall MG. An 8-year compilation of clinical results obtained with Steri-Oss endosseous implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1996;17:669-674, 676.
23. Minsk L, Polson AM, Weisgold A, et al. Outcome failures of endosseous implants from a clinical training center. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1996;17:848-850, 852-854, 856.
24. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, et al. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:173-180.
25. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol. 2000;5:22-31.
26. Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2003;18:417-423.
27. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, et al. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:381-389.
28. Misch CE, Steigenga J, Kazor C. Dental implants of reduced length: a literature review and clinical report of Biohorizons dental implants. Implant Dent. In press (2006).
29. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant protected occlusion, a biomechanical rationale. Compendium. 1994;15:1330, 1332, 1334.
30. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Occlusal considerations for implant-supported prosthesis: implant protected occlusion. In: Misch CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier/Mosby; 2005:472-510.
31. Macgregor ID, Balding JW, Regis D. Flossing behavior in English adolescents. J Clin Periodontol. 1998;25:291-296.
32. Misch CE, Bidez MW. A Scientific Rationale of Dental Implant Design Part III: implant surgery. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1999:329-343.
33. Strong JT, Misch CE, Bidez MW, Nalluri P. Functional surface area: thread form parameter optimization for implant body design. Compendium. 1998;19(Special Issue):4-9.
34. Steigenga J, Al-Shammari K, Misch C, et al. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits. J Periodontol. 2004;75:1233-1241.