The effects of managerial succession on organizational performance

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 585-597

  Hill, Gregory C ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644523565     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui034     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Barnard, Chester I. 1939. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Boyne, George A. 1998. Public choice theory and local government. London: Macmillan.
3. Boyne, George, and Jay Dahya. 2002. Executive succession and the performance of public organizations. Public Administration 80 (1): 179-200.
4. Boyne, George, and Richard Walker. 2004. Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14 (2): 231-52.
5. Brudney, Jeffrey L., Laurence J. O'Toole Jr., and Hal G. Rainey. 2000. Advancing public management: New developments in theory, methods, and practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
6. Burtless, Gary. 1996. Does money matter? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7. Goodman, Paul S. 1982. Change in organizations: New perspectives on theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Greene, William H. 2000. Econometric analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Gujarati, Damodar N. 2003. Basic econometrics. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw Hill.
10. Jencks, Christopher, and Meredith Phillips. 1998. The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11. Lieberson, Stanley, and James F. O'Connor. 1972. Leadership and organizational performance: A study of large corporations. American Sociological Review 37 (1): 117-30.
12. Lynn, Laurence E., Carolyn J. Heinrich, and Carolyn J. Hill. 2000. Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
13. McGregor, Eugene B., Jr. 1974. Politics and the career mobility of bureaucrats. American Political Science Review 68 (1): 18-26.
14. Meier, Kenneth J., and Laurence J. O'Toole. 2003. Public management and educational performance: The impact of managerial networking. Public Administration Review 63 (6): 689-99.
15. Milward, H. Brinton, and Keith Provan. 1998. Principles for controlling agents: The political economy of network structure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 203-11.
16. Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Laurence J. O'Toole. 2004. Public management and organizational performance: The case of law enforcement agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (1): 1-13.
17. O'Toole, Laurence J., and Kenneth J. Meier. 1999. Modeling the impact of public management: Implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (4): 505-26.
18. _. 2002. Plus ça change: Public management, personnel stability, and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (1): 43-64.
19. Provan, Keith G., and H. Brinton Milward. 1995. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1): 1-33.
20. Rainey, Hal G. 2003. Understanding and managing public organizations. 3d ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Texas Educational Excellence Project. 1999. First Superintendent Survey, http://teep.tamu.edu/survey.html (accessed January 2005).
22. Thomas, A. B. 1988. Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance? Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (2): 388-400.
23. Travers, Tony, George Jones, and June Burnham. 1997. The role of the local authority chief executive in local governance. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
24. Weiner, Nan, and Thomas A. Mahoney. 1981. A model of corporate performance as a function of environmental, organizational and leadership influences. Academy of Management Journal 24: 453-70.