Mathematical existence

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 351-376

  Maddy, Penelope ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644519446     PISSN: 10798986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2178/bsl/1122038992     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. KEN AKIBA [2000], Indefiniteness of mathematical objects, Philosophia Mathematica, vol. 8, pp. 26-46.
2. JEREMY AVIGAD [200?], Methodology and metaphysics in the development of Dedekind's theory of ideals, The architecture of modern mathematics: Essays in history and philosophy (J. Ferreiros and J. Gray, editors), Oxford University Press, Oxford, to appear.
3. JODY AZZOUNI [1994], Mathematical myths, mathematical practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. JODY AZZOUNI [2004], Deflating existential consequence: A case for nominalism, Oxford University Press, New York.
5. MARK BALAGUER [1998], Platonism and anti-platonism in mathematics, Oxford University Press, New York.
6. PAUL BERNAYS [1934], On platonism in mathematics, Philosophy of mathematics (P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983, second ed., reprinted, pp. 258-271.
7. DOUGLAS BRIDGES [2003], Constructive mathematics, Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (E. Zalta, editor), summer 2003 ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/sum2003/entries/mathematics-constructive/.
8. JOHN BURGESS [2004], Mathematics and Bleak House, Philosophia Mathematica, vol. 12, pp. 18-36.
9. JOHN BURGESS AND GIDEON ROSEN [1997], A subject with no object, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. JOHN BURGESS AND GIDEON ROSEN [200?], Nominalism reconsidered, Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic (S. Shapiro, editor), to appear.
11. RUDOLF CARNAP [1950], Empiricism, semantics, and ontology, Philosophy of mathematics (P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983, second ed., reprinted, pp. 241-257.
12. CHARLES CHIHARA [1990], Constructibility and mathematical existence, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. JOSEPH DAUBEN [1979], Georg Cantor: His mathematics and philosophy of the infinite, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. MICHAEL DETLEFSEN [1986], Hilbert's program: an essay on mathematical instrumentalism, Reidel, Dordrecht.
15. HAROLD EDWARDS [1992], Mathematical ideas, ideals, and ideology, Mathematical Intelligencer, vol. 14, pp. 6-19.
16. ALBERT EINSTEIN AND LEOPOLD INFELD [1938], The evolution of physics, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1966.
17. SOLOMON FEFERMAN [1987], Infinity in mathematics: is Cantor necessary?, reprinted in Feferman [1998], pp. 28-73.
18. SOLOMON FEFERMAN [1988], Weyl vindicated, reprinted in Feferman [1998], pp. 249-283.
19. SOLOMON FEFERMAN [1998], In the light of logic, Oxford University Press, New York.
20. SOLOMON FEFERMAN [2000], Why the programs for new axioms need to be questioned, pp. 401-413, in Feferman et al. [2000].
21. SOLOMON FEFERMAN, HARVEY FRIEDMAN, PENELOPE MADDY, AND JOHN STEEL [2000], Does mathematics need new axioms?, this BULLETIN, vol. 6, pp. 401-446.
22. HARTRY FIELD [1998], Mathematical objectivity and mathematical objects, Contemporary readings in the foundations of metaphysics (S. Laurence and C. MacDonald, editors), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 387-403.
23. HARTRY FIELD [2000], Indeterminacy, degree of belief, and excluded middle, Truth and the absence of fact, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001, reprinted with a new postscript, pp. 278-311.
24. ABRAHAM FRAENKEL, YEHOSHUA BAR-HILLEL, AND AZRIEL LEVY [1973], Foundations of set theory, second revised ed., North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
25. GOTTLOB FREGE [1884], Foundations of arithmetic, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 1968, (J. L. Austin, translator).
26. HARVEY FRIEDMAN [2000], Normal mathematics will need new axioms, pp. 434-446, in Feferman et al. [2000].
27. KURT GÖDEL [1944], Russell's mathematical logic, reprinted in Gödel [1990], pp. 119-141.
28. KURT GÖDEL [1964], What is Cantor's continuum problem?, reprinted in Gödel [1990], pp. 254-270.
29. KURT GÖDEL [1990], Collected works, volume II, Oxford University Press, New York, (S. Feferman et al., editors).
30. PHILIP KITCHER [1983], The nature of mathematical knowledge, Oxford University Press, New York.
31. MORRIS KLINE [1968], The import of mathematics, Mathematics in the modern world (M. Kline, editor), W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, pp. 232-237.
32. MORRIS KLINE [1972], Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times, Oxford University Press, New York.
33. MORRIS KLINE [1980], Mathematics: the loss of certainty, Oxford University Press, New York.
34. PENELOPE MADDY [1990], Realism in mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35. PENELOPE MADDY [1997], Naturalism in mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. PENELOPE MADDY [2000], Does mathematics need new axioms?, pp. 413-422, in Feferman et al. [2000].
37. PENELOPE MADDY [2001], Naturalism: friends and foes, Philosophical Perspectives 15, Metaphysics 2001 (J. Tomberlin, editor), pp. 37-67.
38. PENELOPE MADDY [2001a], Some naturalistic reflections on set theoretic method, Topoi, vol. 20, pp. 17-27.
39. PENELOPE MADDY [2002], A naturalistic look at logic, Proceedings and addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 76, pp. 61-90.
40. PENELOPE MADDY [200?], Three forms of naturalism, Oxford handbook for the philosophy of mathematics and logic (S. Shapiro, editor), to appear.
41. D. A. MARTIN [1998], Mathematical evidence, Truth in mathematics (H. G. Dales and G. Oliveri, editors), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 215-31.
42. D. A. MARTIN [2005], Gödel's conceptual realism, this BULLETIN, vol. 11, pp. 207-224.
43. A. R. D. MATHIAS [2001], Slim models of Zermelo set theory, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 66, pp. 487-496.
44. GREGORY H. MOORE [1982], Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Springer-Verlag, New York.
45. CHARLES PARSONS [1990], The structuralist view of mathematical objects, Synthese, vol. 84, pp. 303-346.
46. CHARLES PARSONS [1995], Structuralism and the concept of set, Modality, morality and belief (W. Sinnott-Armstrong et al., editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 74-92.
47. CHARLES PARSONS [2004], Structuralism and metaphysics, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 54, pp. 56-77.
48. STEWART SHAPIRO [1997], Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology, Oxford University Press, New York.
49. STEWART SHAPIRO [2000], Thinking about mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
50. SAHARON SHELAH [1993], The future of set theory, Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings, vol. 6, pp. 1-12.
51. JOHN STEEL [2000], Mathematics needs new axioms, pp. 422-433, in Feferman et al. [2000].
52. JOHN STEEL [2004], Generic absoluteness and the continuum problem, http://www.lps.uci.edu/home/conferences/Laguna-Workshops/Laguna2004.html.
53. JOHN STILLWELL [2002], Mathematics and its history, second ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.
54. JAMES TAPPENDEN [200?], Why do elliptic functions have two periods?, to appear
55. MARK VAN ATTEN AND JULIETTE KENNEDY [2003], On the philosophical development of Kurt Gödel, this BULLETIN, vol. 9, pp. 425-476.
56. MARK WILSON [1982], Predicate meets property, Philosophical Review, vol. 91, pp. 549-589.
57. W. HUGH WOODIN [2001], The continuum hypothesis, Parts I and II, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 48, pp. 567-576, 681-690.