Higher order whitening of natural images

Proceedings - 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005

Volumn II, Issue , 2005, Pages 354-360

  Gluckman, Joshua ^a  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; LINEARIZATION; OPTICAL CORRELATION; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

IMAGE WHITENING; NATURAL IMAGES; POWER LAW; POWER SPECTRUM;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 24644514503     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2005.175     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. D.J. Field. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. JOSA, 4(12), 1987.
2. F. Attneave. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psych. Rev., 61:183-193, 1954.
3. H. Barlow. Sensory Commuincation, chapter Possible principles underlying the transformaiton of senosry messages. MIT Press, 1961.
4. H. Chen, P. Belhumeur, and D. Jacobs. In search of illumination invariants. In CVPR, 2000.
5. M. Osadchy, M. Lindenbaum, and D. Jacobs. Whitening for photometric comparison of smooth surfaces under varying illumination. In Workshop on Stat. and Comp. Theories of Vision, 2003.
6. A.J. Bell and T.J. Sejnowski. The independent components of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research, 37(23), 1997.
7. B.A. Olshausen and D.J. Field. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381, 1996.
8. Y. Karklin and M. Lewicki. Learning higher-order structures in natural images. Network: Comp. in Neural Syst., 14:483-499, 2003.
9. P. Hoyer and A. Hyvarinen. A multi-layer sparse coding network learns contour coding from natural images. Vision Research, 42(12): 1593-1605, 2002.
10. E. Simoncelli and E. Adelson. Noise removal via bayesian wavelet coding. In ICIP, 1996.
11. O. Schwartz and E. Simoncelli. Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control. Nature Neuroscience, 4(8), August 2001.
12. M. Wainwright and E. Simoncelli. Scale mixtures of gaussians and the statistics of natural images. In NIPS, 2000.
13. S.C. Zhu and D. Mumford. Prior learning and gibbs reactionn-diffusion. PAMI, 19(1), 1997.
14. S.C. Zhu, Y. Wu, and D. Mumford. Filters, random-fields and maximum-entropy (frame): Towards a unified theory for texture modeling. IJCV, 27(2): 107-126, 1998.
15. B. Wegmann and C. Zetzsche. Statistical dependence between orientation filter outputs used in a human vision based image code. Proc. of Visual Comm. and Image Processing, 1360, 1990.
16. G. Krieger, C. Zetzsche, and E. Barth. Higher-order statistics of natural images and their exploitation by operators selective to intrinsic dimensionality. In ICIP, 1997.
17. J.A. van Hateren. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells. Proc. of the Royal Statistical Society of London (B), 256, 1998.
18. E. Simoncelli and W. Freeman. The steerable pyramid: A flexible architecture for multi-scale derivative computation. In ICIP, 1995.
19. D. Ruderman. The statistics of natural images. Network, 5(4), 1993.
20. R. Valerio, E. Simoncelli, and R. Navarro. Directly invertible nonlinear divisive normalization pyramid for image representation. In Visual Content Processing and Representation, volume 2849 of LNCS. 2003.