Inessential archaeologies: Problems of exclusion in Americanist archaeological thought

World Archaeology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 337-351

  Wilkie, Laurie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Archaeological history; Historical archaeology; Interpretation; Theory

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; PREHISTORIC; RESEARCH;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 24644510766     PISSN: 00438243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00438240500168368     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Andrén, A. 1998. Between Artefacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective. New York: Plenum.
2. Armstrong, D. 2001. Attaining the full potential of historical archaeology. Historical Archaeology, 35: 9-13.
3. Arnold, J., Walsh, M. and Hollimon, S. 2004. The archaeology of California. Journal of Archaeological Research, 12: 1-73.
4. Barile, K. S. and Brandon, J. C. (eds) 2004. Household Chores and Household Choices: Theorizing the Domestic Sphere in Historical Archaeology. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
5. Beaudry, M. (ed.) 1988. Documentary Archaeology in the New World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Beaudry, M. 1994. Women historical archaeologists: who's counting? In Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology (eds M. C. Nelson, S. M. Nelson and A. Wylie). Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 5, pp. 225-8.
7. Beaudry, M., Cook, L. and Mrozowski, S. 1991. Artefacts and active voices: material culture as social discourse. In The Archaeology of Inequality (eds R. McGuire and R. Paynter). Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 150-91.
8. Binford, L. 1961. A new method of calculating dates from kaolin pipestems. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Newsletter, 9(1).
9. Binford, L. 1968. Archaeological perspectives. In New Perspectives in Archaeology (ed. L. Binford and S. Binford). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 5-32.
10. Buchli, V. and Lucas, G. (eds) 2000. Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. London: Routledge.
11. Casella, E. C. 2000. 'Doing trade': a sexual economy of nineteenth-century Australian female convict prisons. World Archaeology, 32: 209-21.
12. Chester, H., Rothschild, N. and DiZerega Wall, D. 1994. Women in historical archaeology: the SHA survey. In Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology (eds M. C. Nelson, S. Nelson and A. Wylie). Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 5, pp. 211-18.
13. Cleland, C. 2000. Historical archaeology adrift? Historical Archaeology, 35: 1-8.
14. Cleland, C. and Fitting, J. 1968. The crisis of identity: theory in historic sites archaeology. The Conference on Historic Site Archaeology Papers, 2: 124-38.
15. Deagan, K. 1982. Avenues of inquiry in historical archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory (ed. M. Schiffer). Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 151-77.
16. Deagan, K. 1983. The mestizo minority: archaeological patterns of intermarriage. In Spanish St. Augustine: The Archaeology of a Colonial Creole Community (ed. K. Deagan). Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 99-124.
17. Deetz, J. 1977. In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life. New York: Anchor Books.
18. Deetz, J. and Deetz, P. 2000. The Times of their Lives: Life, Love, and Death in Plymouth Colony. New York: Anchor Books.
19. Deetz, J. and Dethlefson, E. 1967. Death's head, cherub, urn and willow. Natural History, 76: 29-37.
20. Deloria, V. 1992. Indians, archaeologists, and the future. American Antiquity, 57: 595-8.
21. Echo-Hawk, R. 2000. Ancient history in the new world: integrating oral traditions and the archaeological record in deep time. American Antiquity, 65: 267-90.
22. Epperson, T. 2004. Critical race theory and the archaeology of the African Diaspora. Historical Archaeology, 38: 101-8.
23. Fairbanks, C. 1972. The Kingsley slave cabins in DuVal county Florida, 1968. Conference on Historic Sites Archaeology Papers, 7: 62-93.
24. Farnsworth, P. 2000. Brutality or benevolence in plantation archaeology. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 4: 145-58.
25. Ferguson, L. (ed.) 1977. Historical Archaeology and the Importance of Material Things. Tucson, AZ: SHA Special Publication 2.
26. Flannery, K. 1973. Archaeology with a capital 'S'. In Research and Theory in Current Archaeology (ed. Charles Redman), New York: Wiley, pp. 47-53.
27. Fontana, B. L. 1965. On the meaning of historic sites archaeology. American Antiquity, 31: 61-5.
28. Franklin, M. 1997. Power to the people: sociopolitics and the archaeology of black Americans. Historical Archaeology, 31: 36-50.
29. Franklin, M. 2001. A Black feminist-inspired archaeology? Journal of Social Archaeology, 1: 108-25.
30. Gerzina, G. 1995. Black London: Life before Emancipation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
31. Gilroy, P. 1993. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Hegmon, M. 2004. Setting theoretical egos aside: issues and theories in North American archaeology. American Antiquity, 68: 213-43.
33. Hodder, I. 1985. Post-processual archaeology. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory (ed. M. Schiffer). Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 1-26.
34. Johnson, M. 1996. An Archaeology of Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Joyce, R. A. (ed.) 2002. The Languages of Archaeology: Dialogue, Narrative, and Writing. Oxford: Blackwell.
36. LaRoche, C. and Blakey, M. 1997. Seizing intellectual power: the dialogue at the New York African burial ground. Historical Archaeology, 31: 84-106.
37. Leone, M. 1987. Rule by ostentation: the relationship between space and sight in eighteenth-century landscape architecture in the Chesapeake Bay region of Maryland. In Method and Theory for Activity Area Research (ed. S. Kent). New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 604-33.
38. Leone, M. 1995. A historical archaeology of capitalism. American Anthropologist, 97: 251-68.
39. Leone, M. and Potter, P. (eds) 1999. Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
40. Little, B. J. (ed.) 1992. Text-Aided Archaeology, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 1-6.
41. Lucas, G. 2004. Modern disturbances: on the ambiguities of archaeology. Modernism/Modernity, 11: 109-20.
42. McDavid, C. and Babson, D. (eds) 1997. In the Realm of Politics: Prospects for Public Participation in African-American and Plantation Archeology. Special issue of Historical Archaeology, 31(3): 1-152.
43. McDonald, J. D., Zimmerman, L. J., McDonald, A. L., Tall Bull, W. and Rising Sun, T. 1991. The northern Cheyenne outbreak of 1879: using oral history and archaeology as tools of resistance. In The Archaeology of Inequality (eds R. Paynter and R. McGuire). Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 64-78.
44. McGuire, R. H. (1982). The study of ethnicity in historical archaeology. The Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1: 159-78.
45. Mason, R. 2000. Archaeology and Native American oral traditions. American Antiquity, 65: 239-66.
46. Moreland, J. 2001. Archaeology and Text. London: Duckworth.
47. Murray, T. (ed.) 2004. The Archaeology of Contact in Settler Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Orser, C. E. Jr 1996. A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World. New York: Plenum.
49. Praetzellis, A. and Praetzellis, M. (eds) 1998. Archaeologists as storytellers. Historical Archaeology, 32: 1-96.
50. Purser, M. 1991. 'Several Paradise ladies are visiting in town': gender strategies in the early industrial west. Historical Archaeology, 25: 6-16.
51. Schmidt, P. 1978. Historical Archaeology: A Structural Approach in an African Culture. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
52. Schuyler, R. (ed.) 1980. Archaeological Perspectives on Ethnicity in America: Afro-American and Asian American Culture History. Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
53. Seifert, D. J. 1991. Within sight of the White House: the archaeology of working women. Historical Archaeology, 25: 82-108.
54. Singleton, T. (ed.) 1985. The Archaeology of Slavery and Plantation Life. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
55. South, S. 1977. Method and Theory in Historical Archaeology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
56. Spector, J. D. 1991. What this awl means: toward a feminist archaeology. In Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. Gero and M. Conkey). Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 388-406.
57. Spelman, E. 1988. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
58. Stahl, A. 2001. Making History in Banda: Anthropological Visions of Africa's Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Tarlow, S. and West, S. (eds) 1999. The Familiar Past? Archaeologies of Later Historical Britain. London: Routledge.
60. Tringham, R. 1991. Households with faces: the challenge of gender in prehistoric architectural remain. In Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. Gero and M. Conkey). Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 93-131.
61. Vansina, J. 1985. Oral Tradition as History. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
62. Voss, B. 2000. Feminisms, queer theories, and the archaeological study of past sexualities. World Archaeology, 32: 180-92.
63. Wall, D. 1994. The Archaeology of Gender: Separating the Spheres in Urban America. New York: Plenum.
64. Watson, P., LeBlanc, S. and Redman, C. 1971. Explanation in Archaeology: An Explicitly Scientific Approach. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 3-57.
65. Whelan, M. K. 1991. Gender and historical archaeology: eastern Dakota patterns in the 19th century. Historical Archaeology, 25: 17-32.
66. Whitely, P. 2002. Archaeology and oral tradition: the scientific importance of dialogue. American Antiquity, 67: 405-15.
67. Wilkie, L. A. 2003. The Archaeology of Mothering: An African-American Midwife's Tale. New York: Routledge.
68. Yentsch, A. E. 1994. A Chesapeake Family and their Slaves: A Study in Historical Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.