Eco-labels and electric monks

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 4-7

  Clift, Roland ^a,b   Malcolm, Rosalind ^b   Baumann, Henrikke ^c   Connell, Lucy ^d   Rice, Gareth ^e  

^a Centre for Environmental Strategy   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^c CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d Vodafone   (United States)

^e Panasonic Corporation   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLABELING;

EID: 24644507868     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/1088198054821681     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: "Integrated Product Policy: Building on Environmental Life-Cycle Thinking." Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities COM (2003) 302 final.
2. ECJ Case C-513/99. 2002. Concordia Bus Finland Oy Ab, formerly Stagecoach Finland Oy Ab v Helsingin kaupunki, HKL-Bussiliikenne.
3. GEN (Global Ecolabeling Network). 1999. The ecolabelling guide. Global Ecolabelling Network.
4. Grankvist, G. 2002. Determinants of choice of ecolabelled products. Ph.D. thesis, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
5. Kunzlik, P. 2003. Making the market work for the environment: Acceptance of (some) "green" contract award criteria in public procurement. Journal of Environmental Law 15(2): 175.
6. Salzman, J. 1997. Informing the green consumer: The debate over the use and abuse of environmental labels. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(2): 11-22.
7. Statistics Sweden. 2001. Sustainable development indicators for Sweden - A first set. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden and Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
8. Wrisberg, N. and H. A. Udo de Haes. 2002. Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.