Just the facts, please: Framing and technical information

Environmental Practice

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 223-231

  Kaufman, Sanda ^a   Gardner, Robert ^b   Burgess, Guy ^b  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION;

EID: 24644506104     PISSN: 14660466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1466046603035610     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Buechler, S: M. 2000. Social Movements in Advanced Capitalism. Oxford University Press, New York, 240 pp.
2. Environmental Framing Consortium. 2003. Environmental Framing Consortium Overview, http://www.conflictresearch.org/framing. Accessed April 24, 2003.
3. Environmental Practice. 2003. Special Issue on Environmental Conflict Resolution and Framing. Environmental Practice 5(3): September. Oxford University Press, Cary, NC, 83 pp.
4. Gardner, R., C. Conzelman, K. Mockler, K. Sanchez, and G. Burgess. 2003. Three Colorado Communities and the Challenge of Explosive Population Growth. In Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases, R. J. Lewicki, B. Gray, and M. Elliott, eds. Island Press, Washington, DC, 355-386.
5. Hanke, R., A. Rosenberg, and B. Gray. 2003. The Story of Drake Chemical: A Burning Issue. In Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases, R. J. Lewicki, B. Gray, and M. Elliott, eds. Island Press, Washington, DC, 275-302.
6. Kaufman, S., and M. Momen. 2003. Doan Brook: Latent Intractability. In Making Sense ofIntractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases, R. J. Lewicki, B. Gray, and M. Elliott, eds. Island Press, Washington, DC, 193-224.
7. Lewicki, R. J., B. Gray, and M. Elliott, eds. 2003. Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases. Island Press, Washington, DC, 469 pp.
8. Nelson, J. S., A. Megill, and D. N. McCloskey, eds. 1987. The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 445 pp.
9. Putnam, L. L., and T. R. Peterson. 2003. The Edwards Aquifer Dispute: Shifting Frames in a Protracted Conflict. In Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases, R. J. Lewicki, B. Gray, and M. Elliott, eds. Island Press, Washington, DC, 127-158.
10. Tannen, D. 1979. What's in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations. In New Directions in Discourse Processes, R. Freedle, ed. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 137-181.
11. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Cleveland Air Toxics Pilot Project. http://www.epa.gov/Cleveland. Accessed April 24, 2003.