Quasiparticle interactions for f2-impurity anderson model with crystalline-electric-field: Numerical renormalization group study

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 839-842

  Hattori, Kazumasa ^a   Yotsuhashi, Satoshi ^b,c   Miyake, Kazumasa ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^c PANASONIC CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

CEF singlet ground state; f2; Fermi liquid; Impurity Anderson model; Non fermi liquid; Numerical renormalization group

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644494793     PISSN: 00319015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.74.839     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. K. G. Wilson: Rev. Mod. Phys. 47 (1975) 773.
2. H. R. Krishna-murthy, J. W. Wilkins and K. G. Wilson: Phys. Rev. B 21 (1980) 1044.
3. R. Joynt and L. Taillefer: Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002) 235.
4. H. Tou, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, N. Kimura, Y. Ōnuki, E.Yamamoto and K. Maezawa: Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1374.
5. H. Tou, Y. Kitaoka, K. Ishida, K. Asayama, N. Kimura, Y. Ōnuki and E.Yamamoto: Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 3129.
6. A. Grauel, A. Böhm, H. Fischer, C. Geibel, R. Köhler, R. Modler, C. Schank, F. Steglich and G. Weber: Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 5818.
7. K. W. H. Stevens: Proc. Phys. Soc., Sect. A 65 (1952) 209.
8. M. T. Hutchings: Solid State Phys. 16 (1965) 227.
9. N. Kimura, R. Settai, Y. Ōnuki, E. Yamamoto, K. Maezawa, H. Aoki and H. Harima: Physica B 223-224 (1996) 181.
10. N. Kimura, Y. Haga, E. Yamamoto, Y. Ōnuki and H. Harima: Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 8923.
11. G. Zwicknagl, A. N. Yaresko and P. Fulde: Phys. Rev. B 65 (2002) 081103(R).
12. B. A. Jones and C. M. Varma: Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 843.
13. I. A.eck, A. W. W. Ludwig and B. A. Jones: Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) 9528.
14. S. Yotsuhashi, K. Miyake and H. Kusunose: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71 (2002) 389.
15. z and the overall features of F's (in magnitudes) are not markedly changed compared with anisotropic cases.
16. 2-γ5 states linear combinations of states with J = 2 and those with J = 4. Hund's rule prefers J = 4 to J = 2.
17. T. Takimoto: Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) R14641.
18. M. R. Norman: Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 6904.
19. T. Hotta and K. Ueda: Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 107007.