A software framework for diagnostic medical image perception with feedback, and a novel perception visualisation technique

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 5749, Issue , 2005, Pages 572-580

  Phillips, P W ^a   Manning, D J ^b   Donovan, T ^b   Crawford, T ^c   Higham, S ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Eye Tracking; Feedback; New Modalities; Visualisation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DATA VISUALIZATION; EYE MOVEMENTS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VISUALIZATION;

ANALYSIS TOOLS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION; EYE TRACKING; FINAL DECISIONS; IDENTIFICATION FUNCTIONS; IMAGE MODALITIES; MEDICAL IMAGE PERCEPTIONS; MEDICAL IMAGES; MRI SCANS; NEW MODALITIES; PARTICULAR IMAGES; REGIONS OF INTERESTS; SCAN PATHS; SOFTWARE FRAMEWORKS; TRACE DATUMS; TRACE INFORMATIONS; USER CONTROLS; VISUALISATION; VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUES;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 24644467733     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.595365     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. A. Duchowski, "A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications," Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 34, pp. 455-470, November 2002.
2. D. Carmody, H. Kundel, and C. Nodine, "Comparison scans while reading chest images, taught, but not practiced," Invest Radiol 19(5), pp. 462-466, 1984.
3. E. A. Krupinski, "Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms.," Acad Radiol 3, pp. 137-44., Feb 1996.
4. E. Krupinski, "Influence of experience on scanning strategies in mammography," in Proceedings of SPIE: Medical Imaging 1996: Image Perception, H. L. Kundel, ed., 2712, pp. 95-101, 1996.
5. S. Samuel, H. L. Kundel, C. F. Nodine, and L. C. Toto, "Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs.," Radiology 194, pp. 895-902., Mar 1995.
6. C. Nodine, E. Krupinski, and H. Kundel, "A perceptually-based algorithm provides effective visual feedback to radiologists searching for lung nodules," in Proceedings of the First Conference on Visualization in Biomedical Computing, pp. 202-207, 1990.
7. E. Krupinski, C. Nodine, and H. Kundel, "Perceptual enhancement of tumor targets in chest x-ray images," Perception and Psychophysics 53, pp. 519-526, 1993.
8. A. Poole, L. Ball, and P. Phillips, "In search of salience: A response-time and eye-movement analysis of bookmark recognition," in Proceedings of HCI 2004: People and Computers XVIII-Design for Life., pp. 363-378, Springer-Verlag, 2004.
9. T. Donovan, D. Manning, P. Phillips, S. Higham, and T. Crawford, "The effect of feedback on performance in a fracture detection task," in Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, SPIE, 2005.
10. .E. A. Krupinski, C. F. Nodine, and H. L. Kundel, "A perceptually based method for enhancing pulmonary nodule recognition.," Invest Radiol 28, pp. 289-94., Apr 1993.
11. A. Gale, "Circadian variation in radiology," in Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, A. Gale and F. Johnson, eds., pp. 305-312, Elsevier Science, 1984.
12. S. Webb, ed., Physics of Medical Imaging, Medical Science Series, Institute of Physics Publishing, 1998.
13. W. Cai, D. Feng, and R. Fulton, "A 3d image smoothing method for dynamic functional imaging," in Selected papers from the Pan-Sydney workshop on Visualisation, pp. 99-100, Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2000.
14. M. J. Ackerman, "The visible human project," in Proceedings of the IEEE, 86, pp. 504-511, March 1998.
15. D. V. Beard, E. D. Pisano, K. M. Denelsbeck, and R. E. Johnston, "Eye movement during computed tomography interpretation: eyetracker results and image display-time implications.," J Digit Imaging 7, pp. 189-192, Nov 1994.
16. R. Niimi, K. Shimamoto, A. Sawaki, T. Ishigaki, Y. Takahashi, N. Sugiyama, and E. Nishihara, "Eyetracking device comparisons of three methods of magnetic resonance image series displays.," J Digit Imaging 10, pp. 147-51., Nov 1997.