Probing the relationship between classification error and class similarity

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 71, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1365-1373

  Ahlqvist, Ola ^a   Gahegan, Mark ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CATEGORY DISCRIMINATION; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SIMILITUDE METRICS; STATISTICAL MEASURES;

ERROR DETECTION;

CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; METHODOLOGY; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 24644450434     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.71.12.1365     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ahlqvist, O., 2000. Context Sensitive Transformation of Geographic Information, Dissertation No.16, The Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University Dissertation Series, 141 p.
2. Ahlqvist, O., 2004. A parameterized representation of uncertain conceptual spaces, Transactions in GIS, 8(4):493-514.
3. Ahlqvist, O., J. Keukelaar, and K. Oukbir, 2000. Rough classification and accuracy assessment, International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 14(5):475-496.
4. Ahlqvist, O., J. Keukelaar, and K. Oukbir, 2003. Rough and fuzzy geographical data integration, International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 17(3):223-234.
5. Bouchon-Meunier, B., M. Rifqi, and S. Bothorel, 1996. Towards general measures of comparison of objects, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 84:143-153.
6. Card, D.H., 1982. Using known map categorical marginal frequencies to improve estimates of thematic map accuracy, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 48:431-439.
7. Congalton, R., 1988. Using spatial autocorrelation analysis to explore the errors in maps generated from remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 54:587-592.
8. Congalton, R.G., and K. Green, 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, CRC Press, 137 p.
9. Couclelis, H., 2003. The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge, Transactions in GIS, 7(2):165-175.
10. Crapper, P.F., 1984. An estimate of the number of boundary cells in a mapped landscape coded to grid cells, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 50:1497-1503.
11. Cross, V., and A. Firat, 2000. Fuzzy objects for geographical information systems, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 113:19-36.
12. Dubois, D., and H. Prade, 1990. Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets, International Journal of General Systems, 17:191-209.
13. Ehlers, M., and W. Shi, 1997. Error modelling for integrated GIS, Cartographica, 33(1):11-21.
14. Faucher, C., 2001. Approximate knowledge modeling and classification in a frame-based language: The system CAIN, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 16:743-780.
15. Fisher, P.F., 1996. Visualization of the reliability in classified remotely sensed images, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60:905-910.
16. Fisher, P.F., 1999. Models of uncertainty in spatial data, Geographical Information Systems - Principles and Technical Issues, Second Edition, (P.A. Longley, M.F. Goodchild, D.J. Maguire, and D.W. Rhind, editors), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 191-205.
17. Foody, G.M., and P.M. Atkinson (editors), 2002. Uncertainty in Remote Sensing and GIS, Wiley, Chichester, England, 307 p.
18. th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, 10-12 July, Melbourne, pp. 290-299.
19. Gopal, S., and C. Woodcock, 1994. Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60:181-188.
20. Gärdenfors, P., 2000. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 307 p.
21. Hahn, U., and N. Chater, 1997. Concepts and Similarity, Knowledge, Concepts and Categories (K. Lamberts and D. Shanks, editors), East Sussex, Psychology Press, pp. 43-92.
22. Heuvelink, G.B.M., and P.A. Burrough, 1993. Error propagation in cartographic modelling using Boolean logic and continuous classification, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7(3):231-246.
23. Jensen, K., and J.-L. Binot, 1987. Disambiguating prepositional phrase attachments by using on-line dictionary definitions, Computational Linguistics, 13(3-4):251-260.
24. Jones, C.B., H. Alani, and D. Tudhope, 2003. Geographical terminology servers - Closing the semantic divide, Foundations of Geographic Information Science, (M. Duckham, M.F. Goodchild, and M.F. Worboys, editors), Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 205-222.
25. Kaufman, A., and M.M. Gupta, 1985. Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 351 p.
26. th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, 24-26 April, Lyon, France, pp. 51-56.
27. Klir, J.K., and M.J. Wierman, 1998. Uncertainty-Based Information: Elements of Generalized Information Theory, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 168 p.
28. Leung, Y., 1988. Spatial Analysis and Planning Under Imprecision, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 375 p.
29. Leung, Y., and J. Yan, 1998. A locational error model for spatial features, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(6):607-620.
30. Mennis, J.L., 2003. Derivation and implementation of a semantic GIS data model informed by principles of cognition, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27:455-479.
31. Morris, A., 2003. A framework for modeling uncertainty in spatial databases, Transactions in GIS, 7(1):83-101.
32. Nosofsky, R.M., 1986. Attention, similarity, and the identification- categorization relationship, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115:39-57.
33. Pawlak, Z., 1991. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston, 229 p.
34. Pillsbury, N., M. DeLasaux, R. Pryor, and W. Bremer, 1991. Mapping and GIS database development for California's hardwood resources, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Forest and Rangeland Resources Assessment Program (FRRAP), Sacramento, California, 64 p.
35. Robinson, V.B., 2003. A perspective on the fundamentals of fuzzy sets and their use in geographic information systems, Transactions in GIS, 7(1):3-30.
36. Schneider, M., 1995. Spatial Data Types for Database Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, Fernuniversität, Hagen, Germany.
37. Shepard, R.N., 1987. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science, Science, 237:1317-1323.
38. Tversky, A., 1977. Features of similarity, Psychological Review, 84:327-352.
39. L. Vanderwende, 1995. The Analysis of Noun Sequences using Semantic Information Extracted from On-Line Dictionaries, Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
40. Worboys, M.F., 1998. Computation with imprecise geospatial data, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 22(2):85-106.
41. Usery, E.L., 1996. A conceptual framework and fuzzy set implementation for geographic features, Geographic, Objects, With Indeterminate Boundaries, (P.A. Burrough and A.U. Frank, editors), Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 71-85.
42. Veregin, H., 1999. Data quality parameters, Geographical Information Systems - Principles and Technical Issues, Second Edition, (P.A. Longley, M.F. Goodchild, D.J. Maguire, and D.W. Rhind, editors), John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 177-189.
43. Yazici, A., and K. Akkaya, 2000. Conceptual modeling of geographic information systems applications, Recent Issues on Fuzzy Databases, (G. Bordogna, and G. Pasi, editors), Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 129-151.
44. Zhang, J., and M. Goodchild, 2002. Uncertainty in Geographical Information, Taylor & Francis, London, 266 p.