SETAC-Europe: Second working group on LCIA (WIA-2): Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment: Background document for the second working group on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2)

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 167-174

  Udo De Haes, Helias A ^a   Jolliet, Olivier ^a   Finnveden, Göran ^a   Hauschild, Michael ^a   Krewitt, Wolfram ^a   Müller Wenk, Ruedi ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NITRIC OXIDE; SULFUR DIOXIDE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ECOTOXICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUROPE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE; POLLUTION CONTROL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 2442727491     PISSN: 09483349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02979453     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. ADRIAANSE, A.; BRINGEZU, S.; HAMMOND, A.; MORIGUCHI, Y.; RODENBURG, E.; ROGICH, D. and SCHÜTZ, H. (1997): Resource flows: the material basis of industrial economies. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., ISBN 1-56973-209-4
2. ALDENBERG, T. and SLOB, W. (1991): Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. RIVM report no. 719102002
3. BARNTHOUSE, L.; FAVA, J.; HUMPHREYS, K.; HUNT, R; LAIBSON, K.; NOESEN, S.; OWENS, J.W.; TODD, J.; VIGON, B.; WEITZ, K. and YOUNG, J. (eds.), (1997): Life cycle impact assessment. The state-of-the-art. Report of the SETAC workgroup on LCA impact assessment. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, Florida
4. BURKE, T.A.; DOULL, J.; MCKONE, T.E.; PAUSTENBACH, D.J.; SCHEUPLEIN, R.; UDO DE HAES, H.A. and YOUNG, J.L. (1995): Human health assessment and life-cycle assessment: analysis by an expert panel. ILSI, Washington DC
5. CARTER, W. (1994): Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 44: 881-889
6. DERWENT, R.G.; JENKIN, M.E.; SAUNDERS, S.M. and PILING, M.J. (1998): Photochemical ozone creation potentials for organic compounds in Northwest Europe calculated with a master chemical mechanism. Atmospheric Environment 32: 2429-2441
7. DOURSON, M.L. and STARA, J.F. (1983): Regulatory history and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factors. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 3, 224-238
8. EC (1993): Commission Directive 93/67EEC of 20 July 1993, laying down the principles for the assessment of risks to man and the environment of substances notified in accordance with Council Directive 67/548/EEC. Official Journal of the European communities, L227
9. EC (1996): Technical Guidance Documents in support of Directive 93/ 67/EEC on risk assessment of new notified substances and Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 on risk assessment of existing substances (Parts I, II, III and IV). EC catalogue numbers CR-48-96-001, 002, 003, 004-EN-C. Office for Official Publications of the European Community, 2 rue Mercier, L-2965 Luxembourg
10. EYRE, N.; DOWNING, T.; HOEKSTRA, R.M.; RENNINGS, K. and TOL, R. (1997): Global warming damages. ExternE-Global Warning SubTask. Final report prepared for the European Commission, Contract JOS-CT95-0002
11. FAVA, J.; CONSOLI, F.; DENISON, R.; DICKSON, K.; MOHIN, T. and VIGON, B. (1993): A conceptual framework for life-cycle impact assessment. SETAC, Pensacola
12. FINNVEDEN, G.; ANDERSSON-SKÖLD, Y.; SAMUELSSON, M-O; ZETTERBERG, L. and LINDFORS, L.-G. (1992): Classification (impact analysis) in connection with life-cycle assessment - a preliminary study. In: Product life-cycle assessment - principles and methodology, 172-231. Nord 1992:9. Nordic council of ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark
13. FINNVEDEN, G. (1996): "Resources" and related impact categories. In: H.A. Udo de Haes (ed.), 1996: Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment. SETAC-Europe, Brussels, 39-48
14. FINNVEDEN, G. (1998): On the possibilities of life-cycle assessment, development of methodology and review of case studies. PhD Thesis, Stockholm university
15. GOEDKOOP, M.J.; HOFSTETTER, P.; MÜLLER-WENK, R. and SPRIENSMA, R. (1998): The Eco-Indicator 98 Explained. Int. J. LCA 3 (6): 352-360
16. HEIJUNGS, R.; GUINÉE, J. and HUPPES, G. (1997): Impact categories for natural resources and land use. CML report 138, Leiden
17. HEIJUNGS, R. and WEGENER SLEESWIJK, A. (1999): The structure of impact assessment: mutually independent dimensions as a function of modifiers. Int. J. LCA 4 (1): 2-3
18. HOFSTETTER, P. (1998): Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment. A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere. Kluwer, Boston, Dordrecht, London
19. HUIJBREGTS, M.A.J. (1999): Priority assessment of toxic substances in LCA; application of the uniform system for the evaluation of substances 2.0. Draft IVAM report, University of Amsterdam; part of updated CML guide on LCA (in prep.)
20. International Organization for Standardization, 1998: ISO/DIS 14042: Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Life cycle impact assessment
21. JOLLIET, O. (1996): Impact assessment of human and eco-toxicity in life cycle assessment. In: H.A. Udo de Haes, ed., 1996: Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment. SETAC-Europe, Brussels, 49-61
22. JOLLIET, O. and CRETTAZ, P. (1997): Calculation of fate and exposure coefficients for the life cycle toxicity assessment of air emissions. Int. J. LCA 2 (2): 104-110
23. JOLLIET, O. and Crettaz, P. (submitted): Modelling of exposure efficiency for the characterization of human toxicity in life cycle assessment. Int. Journal of Risk Analysis
24. KAUPPI, P.E.; MIELIKÄINEN, K. and KUUSELA, K. (1992): Biomass and carbon budget of European forests, 1971 to 1990. Science 256, no. 5053, 70-74
25. KLEPPER, O. and D. VAN DE MEENT (1997): Mapping the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of species as an indicator of generic toxic stress. RIVM-report no. 607504001, Bilthoven (NL)
26. LINDEIJER, E. (1998): Workshop report on land use impacts, including survey, 8th annual SETAC-Europe meeting, Bordeaux
27. MÜLLER-WENK, R. (1997): Safeguard subjects and damage functions as core elements of life-cycle impact assessment, IWÖ - Diskussions-beitrag Nr. 42, Universität St. Gallen, ISBN-Nr. 3-906502-42-2
28. MURRAY CH.J.L. and LOPEZ, A.D. (Eds.) (1996): The Global burden of disease, Volume I of Global Burden of Disease and Injury Series, WHO / Harvard School of Public Health / World Bank, Harvard University Press, Boston
29. NICHOLS, P.; HAUSCHILD, M.; POTTING, J. and White, P. (1996): Impact assessment of non toxic pollution in life cycle assessment. In: H.A. Udo de Haes (ed.), (1996): Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment. SETAC-Europe, Brussels, 63-73
30. NOTARNICOLA B.; HUPPES, G. and VAN DEN BERG, N.W. (1998): Evaluating options in LCA: the emergence of conflicting paradigms for impact assessment and evaluation. Int. J. LCA 3 (5): 289-300
31. OWENS, J.W. (1998): Life cycle impact assessment: the use of subjective judgements in classification and characterization. Int. J. LCA 3 (1): 43-46
32. POTTING, J. and HAUSCHILD, M. (1997a): Predicted Environmental impact and expected occurrence of actual environmental impact. Part 1: The linear nature of environmental impact from emissions in life-cycle assessment. Int. J. LCA 2 (3): 171-177
33. POTTING, J. and HAUSCHILD, M. (1997b): Predicted environmental impact and expected occurrence of actual environmental impact. Part 2: Spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment by site-dependent characterisation of environmental impact from emissions. Int. J. LCA 2 (4): 4, 209-216
34. POTTING, J.; SCHÖPP, W.; BLOK, K. and HAUSCHILD, M. (1998a): Site-dependent life-cycle impact assessment in acidification. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2 (2): 63-87
35. POTTING, J.; SCHÖPP, W.; BLOK, K. and HAUSCHILD, M. (1998b): Comparison of the acidifying impact from emissions with different regional origin in life-cycle assessment. Journal of Hazardous Materials 61: 155-162
36. POTTING, J. and HAUSCHILD, M. (1999): The structure of impact assessment. Int. J. LCA 4 (1): 4-6
37. SEPPÄLÄ, J. (1997): Decision analysis as a tool for life cycle impact assessment. Oy Edita Ab, Helsinki. The Finnish Environment 123, ISBN 952-11-0963-7
38. STRAALEN, N.M. VAN and DENNEMAN, C.A.J. (1989): Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 18: 241-251
39. TUKKER, A. (1998): Uncertainty in life-cycle impact assessment of toxic releases. Practical experiences - Arguments for a reductionlistic approach?. Int.J. LCA 3 (5): 246-258
40. TUKKER, A. (1999): Frames in the toxicity controversy. Risk assessment and policy analysis related to the Dutch chlorine debate and the Swedish PVA debate. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/ London/Boston
41. UDO DE HAES, H.A. (ed.), (1996): Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry-Europe, Brussels
42. UDO DE HAES, H.A. and OWENS, J.W. (1998): Evolution and development of the conceptual framework and methodology of life cycle impact assessment. Summary of SETAC and SETAC-Europe work groups on life cycle impact assessment. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, Florida
43. UDO DE HAES, H.A. and JOLLIET, O. (1999): How does ISO/DIS 14042 on life cycle impact assessment accommodate current best available practice? Int. J. LCA 4 (2): 75-80