Glides in speech fundamental frequency are reflected in the auditory NIm response

NeuroReport

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1205-1208

  Mäkelä, Anna Mari ^a,b   Alku, Paavo ^c   Mäkinen, Ville ^a,b   Tiitinen, Hannu ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Auditory; Fundamental frequency (FO); Human; Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Nim; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; LOUDNESS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND INTENSITY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STIMULUS; VOWEL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 2442720024     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200405190-00025     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bolinger D. Intonation and its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1989.
2. Fant G. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton; 1970.
3. Kent RD and Read C. The Acoustic Analysis of Speech. San Diego: Singular; 1992.
4. Gandour J, Wong D and Hutchins G. Pitch processing in the human brain is influenced by language experience. Neuroreport 1998; 9:2115-2119.
5. Levy DA, Granot R and Bentin S. Processing specificity for human voice stimuli: electrophysiological evidence. Neuroreport 2001; 12:2653-2657.
6. Alku P, Sivonen P Palomäki K and Tiitinen H. The periodic structure of vowel sounds is reflected in human electromagnetic brain responses. Neurosci Lett 2001; 298:25-28.
7. Mäkelä AM, Alku P, Mäkinen V, Valtonen J, May P and Tiitinen H. Human cortical dynamics determined by speech fundamental frequency. Neuroimage 2002; 17:1300-1305.
8. May P, Tiitinen H, Ilmoniemi RJ, Nyman G, Taylor JG and Näätänen R. Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex. J Comput Neurosci 1999; 6:99-120.
9. Ragot R and Lepaul-Ercole R. Brain potentials as objective indexes of auditory pitch extraction from harmonics. Neuroreport 1996; 7:905-909.
10. Roberts TPL and Poeppel D. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. Neuroreport 1996; 7:1138-1140.
11. Liberman AM and Mattingly IG. A specialization for speech perception. Science 1989; 243:489-494.
12. Alku P, Tiitinen H and Näätänen R. A method for generating natural-sounding stimuli for cognitive brain research. Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 110:1329-1333.
13. Moore BC and Glasberg BR. A Revision of Zwicker's loudness model. Acta Acustica 1996; 82:335-345.
14. Pardo PJ, Mäkelä JP and Sams M. Hemispheric differences in processing tone frequency and amplitude modulations. Neuroreport 1999; 10: 3081-3086.