Restricting quark matter models by gravitational wave observation

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 69, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 10-

  Sotani, Hajime ^a   Kohri, Kazunori ^b   Harada, Tomohiro ^c  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442702841     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.084008     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. A. Abramovici, W. Althouse, R. Drever, Y. Gursel, S. Kawamura, F. Raab, D. Shoemaker, L. Sievers, R. Spero, K. Thorne, R. Vogt, R. Weiss, S. Whitcomb, and M. Zucker, Science 256, 325 (1992).
2. K. Tsubono, in Proceedings of the First Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Wave Experiments, Villa Tuscolana, Frascati, Rome, 1995, edited by E. Coccia, G. Pizzella, and F. Ronga (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 112.
3. J. Hough, G.P. Newton, N.A. Robertson, H. Ward, A.M. Campbell, J.E. Logan, D.I. Robertson, K.A. Strain, K. Danzmann, H. Lück, A. Rüdiger, R. Schilling, M. Schrempel, W. Winkler, J.R.J. Bennett, V. Kose, M. Kühne, B.F. Scultz, D. Nicholson, J. Shuttleworth, H. Welling, P. Aufmuth, R. Rinkleff, A. Tünnermann, and B. Willke, in Proceedings of the Seventh Marcel Grossman Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation, and Relativistic Field Theories, New Jersey, 1994, edited by R.T. Jantzen, G.M. Keiser, R. Ruffini, and R. Edge (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), p. 1352.
4. A. Giazotto, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 289, 518 (1990).
5. K.D. Kokkotas and B.G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Relativ. 2, 2 (1999).
6. K.D. Kokkotas and B.F. Schutz, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 255, 119 (1992).
7. M. Leins, H.-P. Nollert, and M.H. Soffel, Phys. Rev. D 48, 3467 (1993).
8. N. Andersson and K.D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4134 (1996).
9. N. Andersson and K.D. Kokkotas, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 299, 1059 (1998).
10. K.D. Kokkotas, T.A. Apostolatos, and N. Andersson, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 320, 307 (2001).
11. K.D. Kokkotas and N. Andersson, in the Proceedings of International School of Physics: 23rd Course: Neutrinos in Astro, Particle and Nuclear Physics, Erice, Italy, 2001.
12. O. Benhar, E. Berti, and V. Ferrari, in ICTP Conference on Gravitational Waves 2000, Trieste, Italy, 2000.
13. L. Lindblom, Astrophys. J. 398, 569 (1992).
14. T. Harada, Phys. Rev. C 64, 048801 (2001).
15. U.H. Gerlach, Phys. Rev. 172, 1325 (1968).
16. D. Ivanenko and D.F. Kurdgelaidze, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 2, 13 (1969).
17. N. Itoh, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 291 (1970).
18. J.C. Collins and M.J. Perry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1353 (1975).
19. G. Baym and S.A. Chin, Phys. Lett. 62B, 241 (1976).
20. G. Chapline and M. Nauenberg, Nature (London) 264, 235 (1976)
21. G. ChaplineM. NauenbergPhys. Rev. D 16, 450 (1977).
22. M.B. Kislinger and P.D. Morley, Astrophys. J. 219, 1017 (1978).
23. W.B. Fechner and P.C. Joss, Nature (London) 274, 347 (1978).
24. B.A. Freedman and L.D. McLerran, Phys. Rev. D 17, 1109 (1978).
25. V. Baluni, Phys. Lett. 72B, 381 (1978)
26. V. BaluniPhys. Rev. D 17, 2092 (1978).
27. E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 30, 272 (1984).
28. C. Alcock, E. Farhi, and A. Olinto, Astrophys. J. 310, 261 (1986).
29. P. Haensel, J.L. Zdunik, and R. Schaeffer, Astron. Astrophys. 160, 121 (1986).
30. A. Rosenhauer, E.F. Staubo, L.P. Csernai, T. Øvergård, and E. Østgaard, Nucl. Phys. A540, 630 (1992).
31. K. Schertler, C. Greiner, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and M.H. Thoma, Nucl. Phys. A677, 463 (2000).
32. N.K. Glendenning and C. Kettner, Astron. Astrophys. 353, L9 (2000).
33. J.L. Zdunik, Astron. Astrophys. 394, 641 (2002).
34. M. Sinha, J. Dey, M. Dey, S. Ray, and S. Bhowmick, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 1783 (2002).
35. J.J. Drake, Astrophys. J. 572, 996 (2002).
36. Drake et al. 33 got a 99% confidence upper limit of 2.7% on the unaccelerated pulse fraction from (Formula presented) to 100 Hz. Most recently Burwitz et al. reported that a subsequent observation of RX J1856.5-3754 with XMM-Newton allows the upper limit on the periodic variation in the x-ray region to be reduced to 1.3% at 99% C.L. from (Formula presented) to 50 Hz 39.
37. J.M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Astrophys. J. 550, 426 (2001).
38. F.M. Walter and J.M. Lattimer, Astrophys. J. Lett. 576, L145 (2002).
39. J.A. Pons, F.M. Walter, J.M. Lattimer, M. Prakash, R. Neuhäuser, and P. An, Astrophys. J. 564, 981 (2002).
40. T.M. Braje and R.W. Romani, Astrophys. J. 580, 1043 (2002).
41. V. Burwitz, F. Haberl, R. Neuhaeuser, P. Predehl, J. Truemper, and V.E. Zavlin, Astron. Astrophys. 399, 1109 (2003).
42. M.H. Thoma, J.T. Trumper, and V. Burwitz, astro-ph/0305249.
43. G.G. Pavlov and V.E. Zavlin, astro-ph/0305435.
44. C.W. Yip, M.-C. Chu, and P.T. Leung, Astrophys. J. 513, 849 (1999).
45. Y. Kojima and K. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 108, 801 (2002).
46. H. Sotani and T. Harada, Phys. Rev. D 68, 024019 (2003).
47. K. Kohri, K. Iida, and K. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 109, 765 (2003).
48. J.R. Oppenheimer and G.M. Volkoff, Phys. Rev. 55, 374 (1939).
49. G. Baym and S.A. Chin, Nucl. Phys. A262, 527 (1976).
50. B.A. Freedman and L.D. McLerran, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1130 (1977)
51. Phys. Rev. DB.A. FreedmanL.D. McLerran16, 1147 (1977)
52. Phys. Rev. DB.A. FreedmanL.D. McLerran16, 1169 (1977).
53. T. DeGrand, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and J.E. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2060 (1975).
54. C.E. Carlson, T.H. Hansson, and C. Peterson, Phys. Rev. D 27, 1556 (1983).
55. J. Bartelski, A. Szymacha, Z. Ryzak, L. Mankiewicz, and S. Tatur, Nucl. Phys. A424, 484 (1984).
56. E. Farhi and R.L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2379 (1984).
57. Particle Data Group, K. Hagiwara, Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001 (2002).
58. L. Lindblom and S. Detweiler, Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser. 53, 73 (1983)
59. S. Detweiler and L. Lindblom, Astrophys. J. 292, 12 (1985).
60. E.W. Leaver, Proc. R. Soc. London A402, 285 (1985).
61. H. Sotani, K. Tominaga, and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 65, 024010 (2002).
62. For an ordinary class of neutron stars whose compactness is large, the damping rate of some of relatively lower w modes is certainly smaller than that of (Formula presented) modes 7. Thus, only about the detection of them, the w modes would be more significant than the (Formula presented) modes in this class of neutron stars. For the models of the quark star adopted in this work, however, all damping rates of w modes are larger than that of the lowest (Formula presented) mode, because the compactness is smaller than that of such neutron stars 44. This tendency is discussed and clearly stated in Ref. 44. Therefore, we investigate the parameter dependence of the (Formula presented) modes for our current purposes.
63. M. Cerdonio, L. Conti, J.A. Lobo, A. Ortolan, L. Taffarello, and J.P. Zendri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 031101 (2001).