|
Volumn 140, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 620-621
|
How accurate is a clinical diagnosis of erythema chronicum migrans? Prospective study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of general practitioners and dermatologists in an area where lyme borreliosis is endemic [4]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BORRELIA BURGDORFERI;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS;
DRUG ERUPTION;
ERYTHEMA CHRONICUM MIGRANS;
GENERAL PRACTITIONER;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
LYME DISEASE;
MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES;
NECROBIOSIS LIPOIDICA;
NORMAL HUMAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SKILL;
TICK BITE;
TINEA;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
DERMATOLOGY;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
ENDEMIC DISEASES;
ERYTHEMA CHRONICUM MIGRANS;
FAMILY PRACTICE;
FRANCE;
HUMANS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TINEA;
|
EID: 2442701729
PISSN: 0003987X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.140.5.620 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (24)
|
References (5)
|