Cost effectiveness of railroad fuel spill prevention using a new locomotive refueling system

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 251-262

  Barkan, Christopher P L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Diesel oil spillage; Pollution prevention; Railways; Waste treatment

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FUEL ECONOMY; OIL SPILLS; STANDARDS; WASTE TREATMENT;

LOCOMOTIVE REFUELING SYSTEM; RAILROAD FUEL SPILL PREVENTION;

RAILROADS;

CLEANUP; COST; OIL SPILL; RAILWAY TRANSPORT; WASTE TREATMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2442695091     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2004.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Association of American Railroads, 2002a. Railroad Facts, 2002 Edition. Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC
2. Association of American Railroads, 2002b. Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices Section M--Locomotives and Locomotive Interchange Equipment: RP-5503--Locomotive Fueling Interface. Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC
3. Barkan C. Waggener J. Hockensmith E. Treating storm water Railway Track and Structures 88 1992 24-26 and 39
4. Barkan, C.P.L., Brownlee, R.C., Borer, T.C., 1996. Prevention of spillage during direct truck to locomotive fueling. TD 96-009. Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC
5. Brownlee, R.C., 1984. Railway Industry Wastewater Survey--1982. R-593. Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC
6. Brownlee, R.C., Barkan, C.P.L., 2001. Maintaining Performance of Automatic Shut-off Nozzles Used for Locomotive Fueling. R-919. Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC
7. Cingle, P., McClement, D., 1988. Study of uncontrolled automotive refueling emissions. Report CRC-APRAC-VE-6. Automotive Testing Labs, Inc. East Liberty, OH
8. Dick M.H. Railway Track and Structures Cyclopedia eighth ed. 1955 Simmons-Boardman Publishing New York
9. Ferrone, C., 1992. Sensitivity of motor fuel transportation and delivery to truck selection and specifications. SAE Technical Paper 922479. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA. 1-19
10. Ford T. On-board refueling systems development Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 68 1996 15-20
11. Jenks, C.W., 1998. Technology Assessment of Refueling-Connection Devices for CNG, LNG, and Propane. Transit Cooperative Research Program Research Results Digest Number 25. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
12. Modern Bulk Transporter, 1995. Train Refueling Offers Opportunity for Petroleum Tank Fleet Operators, vol. 58. pp. 50-54
13. Musser G.S. Shannon H.F. Onboard control of refueling emissions SAE Transactions, Section 6 95 1986 816-836
14. Musser, G.S., Shannon, H.F., Hochhauser, A.M., 1990. Improved design of onboard control of refueling emissions. SAE Technical Paper 900155, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA. 1-14
15. Schifter I. Magdaleno M. D́az L. Krüger B. León J. Palmeŕn M.E. Casas R. Melgarejo A. López-Salinas E. Contribution of the gasoline distribution cycle to volatile organic compound emissions in the metropolitan area of Mexico city Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 52 2002 535-541
16. Wetzel F.-J. Improved handling of liquid hydrogen at filling stations: Review of six years' experience International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 23 1998 339-348