Goldberger-Wise variations: Stabilizing brane models with a bulk scalar

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 69, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 8-

  Lesgourgues, Julien ^a,b   Sorbo, Lorenzo ^a  

^a LAPTH   (France)

^b CERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442689087     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.084010     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).
2. W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4922 (1999).
3. T. Tanaka and X. Montes, Nucl. Phys. B582, 259 (2000).
4. C. Csaki, M.L. Graesser, and G.D. Kribs, Phys. Rev. D 63, 065002 (2001).
5. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 63, 064020 (2001)
6. Phys. Rev. DC. Csaki, M. Graesser, L. Randall, and J. Terning, 62, 045015 (2000)
7. Phys. Rev. DP. Kanti, I.I. Kogan, K.A. Olive, and M. Pospelov, 61, 106004 (2000)
8. P. Kanti, K.A. Olive, and M. Pospelov, Phys. Lett. B 481, 386 (2000)
9. Phys. Lett. BJ. Lesgourgues, S. Pastor, M. Peloso, and L. Sorbo, 489, 411 (2000).
10. G.F. Giudice, E.W. Kolb, J. Lesgourgues, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 66, 083512 (2002).
11. O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser, and A. Karch, Phys. Rev. D 62, 046008 (2000).
12. J. Martin, G.N. Felder, A.V. Frolov, M. Peloso, and L. Kofman, Phys. Rev. D (to be published), hep-th/0309001.
13. S. Mukohyama and L. Kofman, Phys. Rev. D 65, 124025 (2002).
14. P. Kanti, K.A. Olive, and M. Pospelov, Phys. Lett. B 538, 146 (2002).
15. V.F. Mukhanov, H.A. Feldman, and R.H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rep. 215, 203 (1992).
16. F. Finelli and R.H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1362 (1999).
17. V.F. Mukhanov, Sov. Phys. JETP 67, 1297 (1988) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 94, 1 (1988)].
18. G.W. Gibbons, R. Kallosh, and A.D. Linde, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 022 (2001).
19. Actually, since Eq. (10) is singular for (Formula presented) there is an ambiguity in its solutions, and also a solution that goes as (Formula presented) as (Formula presented) would be acceptable. However, since we require (Formula presented) to be even under the exchange (Formula presented) the ambiguity is removed and we are left with a solution that goes as (Formula presented)
20. Since the system is always well-behaved in terms of (Formula presented) F is a continuous function of (Formula presented)