Wind tunnel evaluation of an aircraft-borne sampling system

Aerosol Science and Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 311-321

  Irshad, Hammad ^a,c   McFarland, Andrew R ^a   Landis, Matthew S ^b   Stevens, Robert K ^b  

^a Texas AandM University   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^c LOVELACE RESPIRATORY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; AEROSOLS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GASES; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENES; SAMPLING;

AEROSOL SAMPLING; MANIFOLD GAS; TEFLON-COATED;

WIND TUNNELS;

ALUMINUM; HALIDE; MERCURY; POLITEF;

AERODYNAMICS; AEROSOL; AIRBORNE SURVEY; SAMPLING; WIND TUNNEL MODELING;

AEROSOL; AIR SAMPLING; AIRBORNE SURVEY; WIND TUNNEL;

AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER; AEROSOL; AIR POLLUTION; AIR SAMPLING; AIRCRAFT; AIRFLOW; AMBIENT AIR; ARTICLE; DEVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FLOW RATE; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; VELOCITY; WIND TUNNEL;

EID: 2442687798     PISSN: 02786826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02786820490426192     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baron, P. A. (1986). Calibration and Use of the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS 3300), Aerosol Sci. Technol. 5:55-67.
2. Berglund, R. N., and Liu, B. Y. H. (1973). Generation of Monodisperse Aerosol Standards, Environ. Sci. Technol. 7:147-153.
3. Chandra, S. (1996). Shrouded Probes for Aerosol Sampling in Stacks and Ducts, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
4. Chandra, S., and McFarland, A. R. (1995). Comparison of Aerosol Sampling with Shrouded and Unshrouded Probes, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 56:459-466.
5. Chandra, S., and McFarland, A. R. (1997). Shrouded Probe Performance: Variable Flow Operation and Effect of Free-Stream Turbulence, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 26:111-126.
6. Fan, B. J., Wong, F. S., McFarland, A. R., and Anand, N. K. (1992). Aerosol Deposition in Sampling Probes, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 17:326-332.
7. Gong, H., Anand, N. K., and McFarland, A. R. (1993). Numerical Prediction of the Performance of a Shrouded Probe Sampling in Turbulent Flow, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 19:294-304.
8. HPS/ANSI. (1999). Sampling of Airborne Radioactive Substances from the Ducts and Stacks of Nuclear Facilities, ANSI/HPS Standard N13.1-1999. Health Physics Society, McLean, VA.
9. Huebert, B. J., Lee, G., and Warren, W. L. (1990). Airborne Aerosol Inlet Passing Efficiency Measurements, J. Geophys. Res. 95:16369-16381.
10. Kesavan, J., Doherty, R. W., Wise, D. G., and McFarland, A. R. (2001). Factors that Affect Fluorescein Analysis, ECBC-TR-208. Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
11. Landis, M. S., Stevens, R. K., Schaedlich, F., and Prestbo, E. (2002a). Development and Characterization of an Annular Denuder Methodology for the Measurement of Divalent Inorganic Reactive Gaseous Mercury in Ambient Air, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:3000-3009.
12. Landis, M. S., Vette, A. F., and Keeler, G. J. (2002b). Atmospheric Mercury in the Lake Michigan Basin: Influence of the Chicago/Gary urban area, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:4508-4517.
13. McFarland, A. R. (1996). Methodology for Sampling Effluent Air from Stacks and Ducts of the Nuclear Industry, Report LAUR-96-2958. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
14. McFarland, A. R., Gupta, R., and Anand, N. K. (1999). Suitability of Air Sampling Locations Downstream of Bends and Static Mixing Elements, Health Phys. 77:703-712.
15. McFarland, A. R., and Rodgers, J. C. (1993). Single Point Representative Sampling with Shrouded Probes, Report No. LA-12612-MS. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
16. McFarland, A. R., Ortiz, C. A., Moore, M. E., DeOtte, R. E., and Somasundram, S. (1989). A Shrouded Aerosol Sampling Probe, Environ. Sci. Technol. 23:1487-1492.
17. McFarland, A. R., Anand, N. K., Ortiz, C. A., Gupta, R., Chandra, S., and McManigle, A. P. (1998). A Generic Mixer for Achieving Suitable Conditions for Single Point Representative Sampling, Health Phys. 76:1-10.
18. McFarland, A. R., Mohan, A., Ramasrishna, N. H., Rea, J. L., and Thompson, J. (2001). DEPOSITION 2001a, An Illustrated User's Guide, Report 6422/03/01/ARM. Aerosol Technology Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
19. Olan-Figueroa, E., McFarland, A. R., and Ortiz, C. A. (1982). Flattening Coefficient for DOP and Oleic Acid Droplets Deposited on Treated Slides, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 43:395-399.
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1994). Letter from Ms. Mary D. Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, U.S. EPA to Mr. Raymond F. Pelletier, Director, Office of Environmental Guidance, U.S. DOE, 21 November 1994.
21. Vincent, J. H., Stevens, D. C., Mark, D., Marshall, M., and Smith, T. A. (1986). On the Aspiration Characteristics of Large-Diameter, Thin-Walled Aerosol Sampling Probes at Yaw Orientations with Respect to the Wind. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 14:211-224.