|
Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1503-1505
|
Should statisticians reporting to data monitoring committees be independent of the trial sponsor and leadership?
c
NONE
(United States)
|
Author keywords
Clinical trials; Conflict of interest; Data monitoring; Interim analysis
|
Indexed keywords
ACCURACY;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL STUDY;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONFLICT;
CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT;
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
HUMAN;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
LEADERSHIP;
MEDICAL INFORMATION;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RESPONSIBILITY;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIALS DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES;
CONFLICT OF INTEREST;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL;
GUIDELINES;
HUMANS;
LONGITUDINAL STUDIES;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
STATISTICS;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
|
EID: 2442686637
PISSN: 02776715
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/sim.1784 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (21)
|
References (10)
|