Substrate electric dipole moment exerts a pH-dependent effect on electron transfer in Escherichia coli photolyase

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 20, 2004, Pages 6214-6215

  Kapetanaki, Sofia M ^a   Ramsey, Meghan ^b   Gindt, Yvonne M ^b   Schelvis, Johannes P M ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAFAYETTE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEOXYRIBODIPYRIMIDINE PHOTOLYASE; DNA;

ARTICLE; DIPOLE; DNA REPAIR; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE MUTATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PH MEASUREMENT;

ALGORITHMS; DEOXYRIBODIPYRIMIDINE PHOTO-LYASE; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET;

EID: 2442684089     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja049226i     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. MacFarlane, A., IV; Stanley, R. J. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 15203-15214.
2. Sancar, A. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2203-2237 and references therein.
3. Park, H.-W.; Kim, S.-T.; Sancar, A.; Deisenhofer, J. Science 1995, 268, 1866-1872.
4. Husain, I.; Sancar, A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 1109-1120.
5. Jordan, S. P.; Jorns, M. S. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 8915-8923.
6. Sanders, D. B.; Wiest, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5127-5134.
7. Hahn, J.; Michel-Beyerle, M.-E.; Rösch, N. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 2001-2007.
8. Antony, J.; Medvedev, M.; Stuchebrukhov, A. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1057-1065.
9. Weber, S.; Richter, G.; Schleicher, E.; Bacher, A.; Möbius, K.; Kay, C. W. M. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 1195-1204.
10. Jorns, M. S.; Sancar, G. B.; Sancar, A. Biochemistry 1984, 23, 2673-2679.
11. Gindt, Y. M.; Vollenbroek, E.; Westphal, K.; Sackett, H.; Sancar, A.; Babcock, G. T. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 3857-3866.
12. Schelvis, J. P. M.; Ramsey, M.; Sokolova, O.; Tavares, C.; Cecala, C.; Connell, K.; Wagner, S.; Gindt, Y. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12352-12362.
13. Heelis, P. F.; Payne, G.; Sancar, A. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 4634-40.
14. Payne, G.; Heelis, P. F.; Rohrs, B. R.; Sancar, A. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 7121-7127.
15. Heelis, P. F.; Okamura, T.; Sancar, A. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 5694-5698.
16. Aubert, C.; Vos, M. H.; Mathis, P.; Eker, A. P. M.; Brettel, K. Nature 2000, 405, 586-590.
17. Byrdin, M.; Eker, A. P. M.; Vos, M. H.; Brettel, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 8676-8681.
18. Li, Y. F.; Heelis, P. F.; Sancar, A. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 6322-6329.
19. Cheung, M. S.; Daizadeh, I.; Stuchebrukhov, A. A.; Heelis, P. F. Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 1241-1249.
20. 4. The kinetic spectrometer has a 7 ns response time as described in ref 21.
21. Shafirovich, V.; Dourandin, A.; Huang, W.; Luneva, N. P.; Geacintov, N. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1999, 103, 10924-10933.
22. Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 811, 265-322.
23. Boxer, S. G. In The Photosynthetic Reaction Center, 2; Deisenhofer, J., Norris, J. R., Eds.; Academic: San Diego, CA, 1993; pp 170-220.
24. 2 after photoreduction at pH 5.4.
25. Müller, F. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Flavoenzymes; Müller, F., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1991; Vol. I., pp 1-71.
26. Shin, Y. K.; Brunschwig, B.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8668-8669.
27. et = 13.5 Å (edge-to-edge) are used to calculate the limits of ΔU.
28. Tommos, C.; Skalicky, J. J.; Pilloud, D. L.; Wand, A. J.; Dutton, P. L. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 9495-9507.
29. Heelis, P. F.; Deeble, D. J.; Kim, S.-T.; Sancar, A. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1992, 62, 137-143.
30. Page, C. C.; Moser, C. C.; Chen, X.; Dutton, P. L. Nature 1999, 402, 47-52.
31. Gray, H. B.; Winkler, J. R. In Electron Transfer in Chemistry; Balzani, V., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; pp 3-23.
32. AB and λ were assumed independent of the electric field, and T = 293 K.
33. Jiang, Y. L.; Ichikawa, Y.; Song, F.; Stivers, J. T. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 1922-1929.