Multiple measures of outcome in assessing a prison-based drug treatment program

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

Volumn 37, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 65-94

  Prendergast, Michael L ^a   Hall, Elizabeth A ^a   Wexler, Harry K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug abuse; Outcome assessment; Parole; Prisons; Recidivism

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442677485     PISSN: 10509674     EISSN: 15408558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J076v37n03_04     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Anglin, M. D., Danila, B., Ryan, T., & Mantius, K. (1996). Staying in Touch: A Fieldwork Manual of Tracking and Procedures for Locating Substance Abusers for Follow-up Studies. Washington, DC: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, National Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center.
2. Anglin, M. D., Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1999). Treatment alternatives to street crime: An evaluation of five programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(2), 168-195.
3. Anglin, M. D., Longshore, D., Turner, S., McBride, D., Inciardi, J., & Prendergast, M. (1996). Studies of the Functioning and Effectiveness of Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) Programs [Final report]. Los Angeles: UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center.
4. Anglin, M. D., & Perrochet, B. (1998). Drug use and crime: A historical review of research conducted by the UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(9), 1871-1914.
5. Ball, J. C., Rosen, L., Flueck, J. A., & Nurco, D. N. (1981). The criminality of heroin addicts: When addicted and when off opiates. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), The Drugs-Crime Connection (pp. 39-65). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
6. Burdon, W. M. (1999). Help-seeking behaviors among released male inmates with HIV/AIDS: A test of a proposed theoretical model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA.
7. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1995). Correctional Populations in the United States-1993 (NCJ-156241). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
8. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999a). Correctional populations in the United States-1996 (NCJ-170013). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
9. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999b). Prisoners in 1998 (NCJ-175687). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
10. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999c). Probation and Parole in the United States, 1998 (NCJ-178234). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
11. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999d). Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1999. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
12. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2000). Correctional Populations in the United States-1997 (NCJ-177613). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
13. California Department of Corrections. (1998). California Prisoners and Parolees: 1995 & 1996. Sacramento: Data Analysis Unit, Offender Information Services Branch, California Department of Corrections.
14. California Department of Corrections. (2000a). Characteristics of Population in California State Prisons by Institution, June 30, 2000 [On-line]. Available: www.cdc.state.ca.us/pdf/ichar600.pdf.
15. California Department of Corrections. (2000b). Historical Trends: 1979-1999. [Online]. Available: www.cdc.state.ca.us/pdf/hist299.pdf.
16. California Department of Corrections. (2000c). Characteristics of the California Felon Parolees Supervised by the California Department of Corrections, December 31, 1999. [On-line]. Available: www.cdc.state.ca.us/pdf/pchar99.pdf.
17. California Department of Corrections. (2000d). California prisoners and parolees, 2000. Sacramento: Data Analysis Unit, Offender Information Services Branch, California Department of Corrections.
18. Camp, C. G., & Camp, G. M. (1998). The Corrections Yearbook 1998. Middletown, CT: Criminal Justice Institute, Inc.
19. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1998). Continuity of Offender Treatment for Substance Use Disorders from Institution to Community (Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 30). Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services.
20. Chaiken, M. R. (1986). Crime rates and substance abuse among types of offenders. In B. D. Johnson & E. Wish (Eds.), Crime Rates Among Drug-Abusing Offenders. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice. New York: Narcotic and Drug Research, Inc.
21. Chaiken, J. M., & Chaiken, M. R. (1990). Drugs and predatory crime. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and Crime (pp. 203-239). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
23. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
24. Collins, J. J., Hubbard, R. L., Rachel, J. V., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Craddack, S. G. (1982). Criminal Justice Clients In Drug Treatment. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
25. Deitch, D., Koutsenok, I., & Ruiz, A. (2000). The relationship between crime and drugs: What we have learned in recent decades. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 32(4), 391-397.
26. Drug Courts Program Office. (1997). Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
27. Duncan, S., Gossop, M., Marsden, J., & Rolfe, A. (2000). Drug misuse and acquisitive crime among clients recruited to the National Treatment Outcomes Research Study. Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 10(1), 10-20.
28. Field, G. (1985). The Cornerstone program: A client outcome study. Federal Probation, 49, 50-55.
29. Field, G. (1992). Oregon prison drug treatment programs. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails (Nida Research Monograph Series 118, Pp. 142-155). Rockville, MD: National Institute On Drug Abuse.
30. Goldkamp, J. S. (1994). Justice and Treatment Innovation: The Drug Court Movement. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
31. Hubbard, R. L., Collins, J. J., Rachel, J. V., & Cavanaugh, E. R. (1988). The criminal justice client in drug abuse treatment. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86, pp. 57-80). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
32. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Hooper, R. M., & Harrison, L. D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27(2), 261-278.
33. Inciardi, J. A., McBride, D. C., & Rivers, J. E. (1996). Drug Control and the Courts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Jarman, E. (1993). An Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for the Forever Free Substance Abuse Program at the California Institution for Women, Frontera, California. Report to the Legislature, State of California. Sacramento: Office of Substance Abuse Programs, California Department of Corrections.
35. Johnson, B. (1993). DSTAT 1.10: Software for the Meta-analytic Review ofResearch Literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Knight, K., Hiller, M. L., & Simpson, D. D. (1999). Evaluating corrections-based treatment for the drug-abusing criminal offender. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 31(3), 299-304.
37. Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., Chatham, L. R., & Camacho, L. M. (1997). An assessment of prison-based drug treatment: Texas’ in-prison therapeutic community program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 24(3/4), 75-100.
38. Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., & Hiller, M. L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. Prison Journal, 79(3), 337-351.
39. Lockwood, D., & Inciardi, J. A. (1993). CREST Outreach Center: A work release iteration of the TC model. In J. A. Inciardi, F. M. Tims, & B. W. Fletcher (Eds.), Innovative Approaches in the Treatment of Drug Abuse: Program Models and Strategies. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
40. Lowe, L. (1995). A Profile of the Young Adult Offender in California Prisons as of December 31, 1989-1994 (Prepared for the Substance Abuse Research Consortium, Spring 1995). Sacramento: Office of Substance Abuse Programs, California Department of Corrections.
41. Lowe, L., Wexler, H. K., & Peters, J. (1998). The R. J. Donovan In-prison and Community Substance Abuse Program: Three-Year Return-to-Custody Data. Sacramento: Office of Substance Abuse Programs, California Department of Corrections.
42. Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Saum, C. A., & Inciardi, J. A. (1999). Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare. Prison Journal, 79(3), 294-320.
43. McBride, D. C., & McCoy, C. B. (1993). The drugs-crime relationship: An analytic framework. Prison Journal, 73(3/4), 257-278.
44. McNemar, Q. (1962). Psychological Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
45. Mumola, C. J. (1999). Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997: Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
46. Murray, D. W. (1996). Drug abuse treatment in the Federal Bureau of Prisons: A historical review and assessment of contemporary initiatives. In K. E. Early (Ed.), Drug Treatment Behind Bars: Prison-Based Strategies for Change (pp. 89-100). Westport, CT: Praeger.
47. National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (1998). Behind Bars: Substance Abuse and America’s Prison Population. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
48. Office of Applied Studies. (2000). Substance Abuse Treatment in Adult and Juvenile Correctional Facilities: Findings from the Uniform Facility Data Set 1997 Survey of Correctional Facilities. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
49. Office of National Drug Control Policy. (1997). National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC: White House.
50. Office of National Drug Control Policy. (1998). National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC: White House.
51. Office of National Drug Control Policy. (1999). National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC: White House.
52. Ossmann, J. (1999). Evolution of Continuing Care in California. Bidder’s Conference Presentation. Sacramento, CA: Office of Substance Abuse, California Department of Corrections.
53. Pacific Southwest Addiction Technology Transfer Center. (1999). Substance Abuse Services Coordination Agency: Community-Based Organization Handbook. La Jolla, CA: UCSD Pacific Southwest Addiction Technology Transfer Center.
54. Pelissier, B., Gaes, G. G., Camp, S. C., Wallace, S. B., O’Neil, J. A., & Saylor, W. G. (1998). TRIAD Drug Treatment Evaluation Project: Six-Month Interim Report. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Evaluation, Federal Bureau of Prisons.
55. Pelissier, B., Rhodes, W., Saylor, W., Gaes, G., Camp, S., Vanyur, S., & Wallace, S. (2000). TRIAD Drug Treatment Evaluation Project Final Report of Three-Year Outcomes: Part 1. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Evaluation, Federal Bureau of Prisons.
56. Pelissier, B., Wallace, S., O’Neil, J. A., Gaes, G. G., Camp, S., Rhodes, W., & Saylor, W. (In press). Federal prison residential drug treatment reduces substance use and arrests after release. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse.
57. Prendergast, M., Wellisch, J., & Wong, M. (1996). Residential treatment for women parolees following prison drug treatment: Treatment experiences, needs and services, outcomes. Prison Journal, 76(3), 253-274.
58. Speckart, G. R., & Anglin, M. D. (1985). Narcotics and crime: An analysis of existing evidence for a causal relationship. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 3(3), 259-282.
59. Speckart, G. R. & Anglin, M. D. (1986). Narcotics use and crime: An overview of recent research advances. Contemporary Drug Problems, 13, 741-769.
60. Toborg, M. A., Levin, D. R., Milkman, R. H., & Center, L. J. (1976). Treatment Alternatives to Street Crimes (TASC) Projects: National Evaluation Program, Phase I Summary Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
61. Tonry, M., & Wilson, J. Q. (Eds.). (1990). Drugs and Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Wellisch, J., Prendergast, M., & Anglin, M. D. (1993). Criminal justice and drug system linkage: Federal promotion of interagency collaboration in the 1970s. Contemporary Drug Problems, 20, 611-650.
63. Wexler, H. K. (1996a). The Amity prison TC evaluation: Inmate profiles and reincarceration outcomes. Presentation at the California Department of Corrections, Youth and Adult Correctional Agency, Sacramento, November 1996.
64. Wexler, H. K., Blackmore, J., & Lipton, D. S. (1991). Project REFORM: Developing a drug abuse treatment strategy for corrections. Journal of Druglssues, 21(2), 469-490.
65. Wexler, H. K., De Leon, G., Kressel, D., & Peters, J. (1999). The amity prison TC evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(2), 147-167.
66. Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., & Lipton, D. S. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 71-92.
67. Wexler, H. K., & Graham, W. F. (1993a). Prison-based therapeutic community for substance abusers: Six-month evaluation findings. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario.
68. Wexler, H. K., & Graham, W.F. (1993b). Evaluation of a prison therapeutic community: Relationship between crime and drug histories, psychological profiles, and 6-month outcomes. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Phoenix, AZ, October 1993.
69. Wexler, H. K., Graham, W.F., Koronkowski, R., & Lowe, L. (1995). Amity Therapeutic Community Substance Abuse Program Preliminary Return to Custody Data. New York: Center for Therapeutic Community Research, National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., May 1995.
70. Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Lowe, L., & Peters, J. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. Prison Journal, 79(3), 321-336.
71. Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594-604.