Incentive incompatibility and starting-point bias in iterative valuation questions: Comment

Land Economics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 312-315

  Aadland, David ^a   Caplan, Arthur J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ENICOSTEMA;

EID: 2442675667     PISSN: 00237639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3654745     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Alberini, Anna, Barbara Kanninen, and Richard T. Carson. 1997. "Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data." Land Economics 73 (Aug.): 309-24.
2. Boyle, Kevin J., Richard C. Bishop, and Michael P. Welsh. 1985. "Starting Point Bias in Contingent Valuation Bidding Games." Land Economics 61 (May): 188-94.
3. Cameron, Trudy Ann, and John Quiggin. 1994. "Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a 'Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up' Questionnaire." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 (3): 218-34.
4. Greene, William H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
5. Herriges, Joseph A., and Jason F. Shogren. 1996. "Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (1): 112-31.
6. Whitehead, John C. 2002. "Incentive Incompatibility and Starting-Point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions." Land Economics 78 (May): 285-97.