The effect of a reason's truth-value on the judgment of a fallacious argument

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 173-184

  Neuman, Yair ^a   Glassner, Amnon ^a   Weinstock, Michael ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Arguments; Cognitive processes; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 2442671741     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baron J. Myside bias in thinking about abortion Thinking and Reasoning 1 1991 221-235
2. Cherubini P. Garnham A. Oakhill J. Morley E. Can any ostrich fly?: Some new data on belief bias in syllogistic reasoning Cognition 69 1998 179-218
3. Copi I.M. Burgess-Jackson K. Informal logic 1996 Prentice Hall NJ
4. Eemeren F.H. Grootendorst R. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies 1992 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ
5. Eemeren F.H. Grootendorst R. Henkemans F.S. Fundamentals of argumentation theory 1996 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ
6. Evans J.S. Bias and rationality Manktelow K.I. Over D.E. Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives 1993 6 30 Routledge London
7. Franks B.A. Deductive reasoning with prose passages: Effects of age, inference form, prior knowledge, and reading skill International Journal of Behavioral Development 21 1997 501-535
8. Kuhn D. The skills of argument 1991 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
9. Luria A.R. Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations 1976 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
10. Markovits H. Vachon R. Reasoning with contrary-to-fact propositions Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 47 1989 398-412
11. Means M.L. Voss J.F. Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among students of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels Cognition and Instruction 14 1996 139-178
12. Neuman Y. Go ahead prove that God does not exist! On student's ability to deal with fallacious arguments Learning and Instruction 13 2003 367-380
13. Neuman Y. Weitzman E. The role of text representation in students' ability to identify fallacious arguments Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 56A 5 2003 849-864
14. Perkins D.N. Reasoning as it is and could be: An empirical perspective In Topping D.M. Crowell D.C. (Eds.), Thinking across cultures: The third international conference on thinking 1989 175-194 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ
15. Reynolds R.A. Reynolds J.L. Evidence Dillard J.P. Pfau M. The persuasion handbook 2002 427-444 Sage London
16. Shaw V. The cognitive processes in informal reasoning Thinking and Reasoning 2 1996 51-80
17. Voss J. Means M.L. Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation Learning and Instruction 1 1991 337-350
18. Walton D.N. Informal fallacies: Toward a theory of argument criticisms 1987 John Benjamin Publishing Company Amsterdam
19. Walton D.N. Informal logic: A handbook for critical argumentation 1989 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
20. Weinstock M. Neuman Y. Tabak I. Missing the point or missing the norm: Epistemological norms as predictors of students' ability to identify fallacious arguments Contemporary Educational Psychology 29 2004 77-94