Whose duty is it anyway?: the Kennedy Krieger opinion and its implications for public health research.

Journal of health care law & policy

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 109-147

  Hoffmann, Diane E ^a   Rothenberg, Karen H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CHILD; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ETHICS; HOUSING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JURISPRUDENCE; LEAD POISONING; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL LIABILITY; PARENTAL CONSENT; PERSONNEL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; LEGAL APPROACH;

BALTIMORE; CHILD; DISCLOSURE; DUTY TO WARN; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HOUSING; HUMANS; JUDICIAL ROLE; LEAD POISONING; LIABILITY, LEGAL; NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; PARENTAL CONSENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; RISK;

EID: 2442669394     PISSN: 10974768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (0)