Comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct stone;Koledok taşi şüphesi olan hastalarda manyetik rezonans kolanjiopankreatikografi (MRCP) ile endoskopik retrograd kolanjiopankreatikografinin (ERCP) karşilaştirilmasi

Turkish Journal of Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 157-162

  Bostanci, Erdal Birol ^a,b   Yol, Sinan ^a   Özoǧul, Yusuf Bayram ^a   Kayaalp, Cüneyt ^a   Atalay, Fuat ^a   Akoǧlu, Musa ^a  

^a TURKIYE YUKSEK IHTISAS HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bile duct stone; ERCP; MRCP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLESTASIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 2442661685     PISSN: 13000705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, et al: Choledocholithiasis: Evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 1998; 209: 435-442
2. Gallix BP, Regent D, Bruel JM: Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging 2001; 26: 21-27
3. Pasanen P, Partanen K, Pikkarainen P, et al: Ultrasonography, CT and ERCP in the diagnosis of choledochal stones. Acta Radiol 1992; 33: 53-56
4. Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology 1987; 162: 419-424
5. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al: Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976; 70: 314-320
6. Soto JA, Yücel EK, Barish MA, et al: MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996; 199: 91-98
7. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. Pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). J Comput Assist Tomography 1998; 22: 845-850
8. De Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, et al: Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 26-31
9. Stiris MG, Tennqe B, Aadland E, et al: MR cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Acta Radiologica 2000; 41: 269-272
10. Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, et al: Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 148-152
11. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, et al: Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2900-2904
12. Laokpessi A, Bouillet P, Sautereau D, et al: Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2354-2359
13. Yetkin G, Akgün I, Kebudi A ve ark: Manyetik rezonans kolanjiografinin bilier obstrüktif hastaliklarin tanisindaki yeri. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 2002; 18: 24-30
14. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, et al: Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998; 207: 21-32