On reconstructing n-point configurations from the distribution of distances or areas

Advances in Applied Mathematics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 709-735

  Boutin, Mireille ^a   Kemper, Gregor ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICS IN THE SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442660007     PISSN: 01968858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0196-8858(03)00101-5     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. J.L. Mundy, A. Zisserman (Eds.), Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision, Artif. Intell., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
2. R. Hartley, A. Zisserman, Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001.
3. N.M. Thiéry, Algebraic invariants of graphs: a study based on computer exploration, SIGSAM Bull. 34 (2000) 9-20.
4. M. Pouzet, Quelques remarques sur les résultats de Tutte concernant le problème de Ulam, Publ. Dép. Math. (Lyon) 14 (1977) 1-8.
5. 4 and the shape of sets of vectors, Appl. Algebra Engrg. Comm. Comput. 7 (1996) 53-57.
6. H. Derksen, G. Kemper, Computational Invariant Theory, Encyclopaedia Math. Sci., vol. 130, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2002.
7. W. Bosma, J.J. Cannon, C. Playoust, The Magma algebra system I: The user language, J. Symbolic Comput. 24 (1997) 235-265.
8. B. Char, K. Geddes, G. Gonnet, M. Monagan, S. Watt, Maple Reference Manual, Waterloo Maple, Waterloo, Ontario, 1990.
9. H. Weyl, The Classical Groups, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1946.
10. C. de Concini, C. Procesi, A characteristic free approach to invariant theory, Adv. in Math. 21 (1976) 330-354.
11. P.E. Newstead, Intoduction to Moduli Problems and Orbit Spaces, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1978.
12. T. Tasdizen, S. Velipasalar, D.B. Cooper, Shape based similarity measure for image retrieval, Technical Report SHAPE-TR-2001-03, SHAPE lab, Brown University, Providence, 2001.