An assessment of nitrogen-based manure application rates on 39 U.S. swine operations

Journal of Environmental Quality

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 1106-1113

  Lory, John A ^a   Massey, Raymond E ^a   Zulovich, Joseph M ^a   Hoehne, John A ^a   Schmidt, Amy M ^a   Carlson, Marcia S ^a   Fulhage, Charles D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COSTS; CROPS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MANURES; NITROGEN;

CROP ROTATIONS; DATA COLLECTION; MANURE MANAGEMENT;

WATER QUALITY;

NITROGEN;

AGRICULTURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORN; CROPPING SYSTEM; GRASS; LAGOON; MANURE; NONHUMAN; SOYBEAN; SWINE; UNITED STATES; WATER QUALITY; WHEAT;

ANIMALIA; GLYCINE MAX; SUS SCROFA; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 2442657868     PISSN: 00472425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.1106     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Araji, A.A., Z.O. Abdo, and P. Joyce. 2001. Efficient use of animal manure on cropland - Economic analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 79:179-191.
2. Beegle, D., and A.M. Wolf. Undated. Soil test recommendations handbook for agronomic crops. Agric. Analytic Serv. Lab., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park.
3. Boessen, C.R., and J.M. Zulovich. 2003. Swine production and financial analysis program. Chapter 3. In Missouri swine enterprise manual. Ext. Multimedia Publ. MM102. Univ. of Missouri, Columbia.
4. Boland, M.A., K.A. Foster, P.V. Preckel, D.D. Jones, and B.C. Joern. 1999. Using linear programming to minimize manure storage and application costs in pork production. J. Prod. Agric. 12:405-408.
5. Buholtz, D.D. 1992. Soil test interpretations and recommendations handbook. Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia.
6. Cross, T.L., and G.M. Perry. 1995. Depreciation patterns for agricultural machinery. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 77:194-204.
7. Fleming, R.A., B.A. Babcock, and E. Wang. 1998. Resource or waste? The economics of swine manure storage and management. Rev. Agric. Econ. 20:96-113.
8. Forster, D.L. 1997. Economic issues in animal waste management. p. 33-48. In J.L. Hatfield and B.A. Stewart (ed.) Animal waste utilization: Effective use of manure as a soil resource. Ann Arbor Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
9. Gollehon, N., M. Caswell, M. Ribaudo, R. Kellogg, C. Lander, and D. Letson. 2001. Confined animal production and manure nutrients. Agric. Info. Bull. 771. USDA Econ. Res. Serv., Washington, DC.
10. Griffith, W.K., and L.S. Murphy. 1996. Macronutrients in forage production. p. 13-28. In R.E. Joost and C.A. Roberts (ed.) Nutrient cycling in forage systems. Potash Phosphate Inst., Manhattan, KS.
11. Janzen, R.A., W.B. McGill, J.J. Leonard, and S.R. Jeffery. 1999. Manure as a resource - Ecological and economic considerations in balance. Trans. ASAE 42:1261-1273.
12. Lazarus, W.F., and R.G. Koehler. 2002. The economics of applying nutrient-dense livestock waste at low rates. Rev. Agric. Econ. 24:141-159.
13. Letson, D., and N. Gollehon. 1998. Spatial economics of targeting manure policy. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34:185-193.
14. Lorimor, J., W. Powers, and A. Sutton. 2000. Manure characteristics. MWPS-18. Midwest Plan Service, Ames, IA.
15. Mahan, D.C., and R.G. Shields. 1998. Macro- and micro-mineral composition of pigs from birth to 145 kilograms of body weight. J. Anim. Sci. 78:506-512.
16. Massey, R.E., J.A. Lory, J.M. Zulovich, C.D. Fulhage, and J.A. Hoehne. 2000. Comprehensive software for manure management planning. p. 468-475. In J.A. Moore (ed.) Animal agriculture and food processing waste. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI.
17. National Academy of Sciences. 1971. Atlas of nutritional data on US and Canadian Feeds. NAS, Washington, DC.
18. Potash Phosphate Institute. 2001. Nutrients removed in harvested portion of crop [Online]. Available at www.ppi-ppic.org/ppiweb/canadaw.nsf/87cb8a98bf72572b8525693e0053ea70/ 2c5413d411351d7c06256a09007421b1/$FILE/Master.PDF (verified 22 Jan. 2004). PPI, Norcross, GA.
19. Roka, F.M., D.L. Hoag, and K.D. Zering. 1995. Making economic sense of why swine effluent is sprayed in North Carolina and hauled in Iowa. p. 545-552. In K. Steele (ed.) Animal waste and the land-water interface. Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, FL.
20. SAS Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT guide to personal computers. Version 6 ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
21. Shields, R.G., D.C. Manhan, and P.L. Graham. 1983. Changes in swine body composition form birth to 145 kg. J. Anim. Sci. 57:43-54.
22. Stevenson, W.H., P.E. Brown, and L.W. Forman. 1926. The economic value of farm manure as a fertilizer on Iowa soils. Bull. 236. Agric. Exp. Stn., Iowa State Univ., Ames.
23. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. 1999. 1997 Census of agriculture. AC97-A-51. Vol. 1. Geographic Area Series, Washington, DC.
24. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2000. Agriculture statistics. USDA, Washington, DC.
25. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1992. Agricultural waste management handbook. USDA, Washington DC.
26. USEPA. 2003. National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitation guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs); Final rule. Fed. Regist. 68(29):7176-7274.
27. Voss, R.D., J.E. Sawyer, A.P. Mallarino, and R. Killorn. 1999. General guide for crop nutrient recommendations. Univ. Ext., Iowa State Univ., Ames.