Optimizing and validating an approach for identifying glaucomatous change in optic nerve topography

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1396-1403

  Tan, James C H ^a   Hitchings, Roger A ^a  

^a MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DISEASE COURSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; OPTIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL FIELD; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASER; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIMETRY; TOMOGRAPHY; VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; PROBABILITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 2442654328     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0025     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Dreher AW, Tso PC, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:221-229.
2. Cioffi GA, Robin AL, Eastman RD, Perell HF, Sarfarazi FA, Kelman SE. Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope: reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:57-62.
3. Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse FE, Volcker HE. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1044-1049.
4. Chauhan BC, Blanchard JW, Hamilton DC, LeBlanc RP. Technique for detecting serial topographic changes in the optic disc and peripapillary retina using scanning laser tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:775-782.
5. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, Le Blanc RP. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1492-1499.
6. Quigley HA, Pease ME. Change in the optic disc and nerve fiber layer estimated with the glaucoma-scope in monkey eyes. J Glaucoma. 1996;5:106-116.
7. Yamada N, Mills RP, Leen MM, Emond MJ, Reynolds AC, Stanford DC. Probability maps of sequential glaucoma-scope images help identify significant change. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:279-287.
8. Yamada N, Edmond MJ, Mills R, Chen PP, Stanford DC. Detection of optic disc changes with glaucoma-scope probability maps. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:378-387.
9. Kamal D, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA, Fitzke FW. Use of sequential Heidelberg retina tomograph images to identify changes at the optic disc in ocular hypertensive patients at risk of developing glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:993-998.
10. Kamal DS, Viswanathan AC, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, Bunce C. Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:290-294.
11. Burgoyne CF, Mercante DE, Thompson HW. Change detection in regional and volumetric disc parameters using longitudinal confocal scanning laser tomography. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:455-466.
12. Ervin JC, Lemij HG, Mills RP, Quigley HA, Thompson HW, Burgoyne CF. Clinician change detection viewing longitudinal stereo-photographs compared to confocal scanning laser tomography in the LSU Experimental Glaucoma (LEG) Study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:467-481.
13. Tan JCH, Hitchings RA. Approach for identifying glaucomatous optic nerve progression by scanning laser tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2621-2626.
14. Tan JCH, Hitchings RA. Reference plane definition and reproducibility in optic nerve head images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1132-1137.
15. Tan JCH, White E, Poinoosawmy D, Hitchings RA. Validity of rim area measurements by different reference planes. J Glaucoma. In press.
16. Tan JCH, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Reasons for rim area variability in scanning laser tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1126-1131.
17. Tan JCH, Garway-Heath DF, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Variability across regions of the optic nerve head in scanning laser tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:557-559.
18. AGIS Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445-1455.
19. Tan JCH, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke F, Hitchings RA. Magnification changes in scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:137-141.
20. Bellezza AJ, Rintalan CJ, Thompson HW, et al. Deformation of the lamina cribrosa and anterior scleral canal in early experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:623-637.
21. Chauhan BC, Pan J, Archibald ML, et al. Effect of intraocular pressure on optic disc topography, electroretinography, and axonal loss in a chronic pressure-induced rat model of optic nerve damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2969-2976.
22. Schulzer M. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1589-1595.
23. Schulzer M, Anderson DR, Drance SM. Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard (published correction appears in J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1167-1179) J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1167-1179.
24. Schulzer M, Anderson DR, Drance SM. Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard (published correction appears in J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1167-1179) J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1167-1179.
25. Werner EB. In discussion: Schulzer M, and the Normal Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1595.
26. Tan JCH, Franks WA, Hitchings RA. Interpreting glaucoma progression by white-on-white perimetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:585-592.
27. Pederson JE, Anderson DR. The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:490-495.
28. Sommer A, Pollack I, Maumenee AE. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. 1: methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;9:1444-1448.
29. Odberg T, Riise D. Early diagnosis of glaucoma: the value of successive stereophotography of the optic disc. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1985;63:257-263.
30. Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:62-65.
31. Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A, Alanko HI. Rate and pattern of neuroretinal rim area decrease in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:206-210.
32. Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ. Initial glaucomatous optic disk and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and their progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:485-490.
33. Jonas JB, Fernandez MC, Sturmer J. Pattern of glaucomatous neuroretinal rim loss. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:63-68.
34. Kirsch RE, Anderson DR. Clinical recognition of glaucomatous cupping. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;75:442-454.