Patient choice in treatment of vestibular Schwannoma

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 130, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 611-616

  Pogodzinski, Matthew S ^a,b   Harner, Stephen G ^a,b   Link, Michael J ^a,b  

^a Mayo Clinic ^*

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROSURGERY; NEURILEMOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT; RADIOSURGERY; REVIEW; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; VESTIBULAR DISORDER;

EID: 2442649029     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Kaylie DM, Horgan MJ, Delashaw JB, et al. A meta-analysis comparing outcomes of microsurgery and gamma knife radiosurgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1850-6.
2. Sekhan LN, Gormley WB, Wright DC. The best treatment for vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma): microsurgery or radiosurgery? Am J Otol 1996;17:676-82.
3. Hudgins WR. Patient's attitudes about outcomes and the role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery 1994;34:459-63.
4. Kornblum J. Americans Log On for Health Info. USA Today July 16, 2003.
5. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hearing Preservation in Acoustic Neuroma (Vestibular Schwannoma). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:179-80.
6. Patel HR, Mirsadraee S, Emberton M. The patient's dilemma: prostate cancer treatment choices. J Urol 2003;169:828-33.
7. Auvinen A, Vornanen T, Tammela T, et al. A randomized trial of the choice of treatment in prostate cancer: design and baseline characteristics. Br J Urol 2001;88:708-15.
8. Cotton T, Locker A, Jackson L, et al. A prospective study of patient choice in treatment of primary breast cancer. Euro J Surg Oncol 1991;17:115-7.