Multi-detector row CT: Effect of iodine dose reduction on hepatic and vascular enhancement

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 176, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 556-563

  Roos, Justus E ^a   Desbiolles, L M ^a   Weishaupt, D ^a   Wildermuth, S ^a   Hilfiker, P R ^a   Marincek, B ^a   Boehm, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Abdomen, CT; Aorta, CT; Contrast media, CT; Liver, CT; Multi detector row CT, MDCT

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPENTOL; CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODINE; IODOBENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA FLOW; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOSE CALCULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LIVER BLOOD FLOW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AORTOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LIVER; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AORTOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; IODINE; LIVER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 2442636630     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813018     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baron RL, Oliver JH, Dodd GD et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT. Radiology 1996; 199 (2): 505-511
2. Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB, Nino-Murcia M et al. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (American Journal of Roentgenology 1995; 164 (4): 879-884
3. Freeny PC, Gardner JC, von Ingersleben G et al. Hepatic helical CT: effect of reduction of iodine dose of intravenous contrast material on hepatic contrast enhancement. Radiology 1995; 197 (1): 89-93
4. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Radiology 1993; 187 (2): 327-331
5. Garcia PA, Bonaldi VM, Bret PM et al. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT. Radiology 1996; 199 (1): 185-189
6. Foley WD, Hoffmann RG, Quiroz FA et al. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol. Radiology 1994; 192 (2): 367-371
7. Small WC, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME et al. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement. American Journal of Roentgenology 1994; 163 (1): 87-92
8. Kopka L, Rodenwaldt J, Fischer U et al. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: effects of bolus tracking and different volumes of contrast material. Radiology 1996; 201 (2): 321-326
9. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S et al. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 1998; 171 (2): 429-432
10. Brink JA, Heiken JP, Forman HP et al. Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material. Radiology 1995; 197 (1): 83-88
11. Engeroff B, Kopka L, Harz C et al. [Impact of different iodine concentrations on abdominal enhancement in biphasic multislice helical CT (MS-CT)]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173 (10): 938-941
12. Kopka L, Rogalla P, Hamm B. [Multislice CT of the abdomen-current indications and future trends]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174 (3): 273-282
13. Schorn C, Obenauer S, Funke M et al. [Slice sensitivity profile and image pixel noise of multi-slice spiral CT in comparison with single slice spiral CT]. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1999; 171 (3): 219-225
14. Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Reinhold C et al. Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase. Radiology 1995; 197 (2): 357-363
15. Zeman RK, Baron RL, Jeffrey RB et al. Helical body CT: evolution of scanning protocols. American Journal of Roentgenology 1998; 170 (6): 1427-1438
16. Frederick MG, McElaney BL, Singer A et al. Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate? American Journal of Roentgenology 1996; 166 (6): 1305-1310
17. Miller FH, Butler RS, Hoff FL et al. Using triphasic helical CT to detect focal hepatic lesions in patients with neoplasms. American Journal of Roentgenology 1998; 171 (3): 643-649
18. Hanninen EL, Vogl TJ, Felfe R et al. Detection of Focal Liver Lesions at Biphasic Spiral CT: Randomized Double-Blind Study of the Effect of Iodine Concentration in Contrast Materials. Radiology 2000; 216 (2): 403-409
19. Kopka L, Funke M, Fischer U et al. Parenchymal liver enhancement with bolus-triggered helical CT: preliminary clinical results. Radiology 1995; 195 (1): 282-284
20. Bae K, Heiken J, Brink J. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate-pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 1998; 206 (2): 455-464
21. Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL et al. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Radiology 1999; 210 (1): 97-101
22. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part 1. Prediction with a computer model. Radiology 1998; 207 (3): 647-655
23. Kopka L, Funke M, Vosshenrich R et al. Helical CT of the liver: evaluation of injection flow rate, mode, and scan delay with a reduced-volume contrast medium bolus. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1995; 19 (3): 406-411
24. Kim S, Kim JH, Han JK et al. Prediction of optimal injection protocol for tumor detection in contrast-enhanced dynamic hepatic CT using simulation of lesion-to-liver contrast difference. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics: the Official Journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society 2000; 24 (5): 317-327
25. Garcia P, Genin G, Bret PM et al. Hepatic CT enhancement: effect of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model. Abdominal Imaging 1997; 24 (6): 597-603
26. Yamashita Y, Komohara Y, Takahashi M et al. Abdominal Helical CT: Evaluation of Optimal Doses of Intravenous Contrast Material - A Prospective Randomized Study. Radiology 2000; 216 (3): 718-723
27. Kormano M, Partanen K, Soimakallio S et al. Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight. Investigative Radiology 18 (4): 364-367
28. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL et al. Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 1995; 195 (2): 353-357
29. Hollett MD, Jorgensen MJ, Jeffrey RB. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT. Radiology 1995; 195 (2): 359-361
30. Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Anderson JH. Effect of contrast concentration on abdominal enhancement in the rabbit: spiral computed tomography evaluation. Acad Radiol 1995; 2 (3): 226-231
31. Baker ME, Beam C, Leder R et al. Contrast material for combined abdominal and pelvic CT: can cost be reduced by increasing the concentration and decreasing the volume? American Journal of Roentgenology 1993; 160 (3): 637-641
32. Kopecky KK, Buckwalter KA, Sokiranski R. Multi-slice CT spirals past single-slice CT in diagnostic efficacy. 1999; 21 (4): 36-42
33. McCollough CH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Medical Physics 1999; 26 (11): 2223-2230
34. Dinkel HP, Fieger M, Knupffer J et al. Optimizing liver contrast in helical liver CT: value of a real-time bolus-triggering technique. European Radiology 1998; 8 (9): 1608-1612