Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Improves Cognitive Flexibility but Impairs Response Inhibition in Parkinson Disease

Archives of Neurology

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 697-700

  Witt, Karsten ^a   Pulkowski, Ulrich ^a   Herzog, Jan ^a   Lorenz, Delia ^a   Hamel, Wolfgang ^a   Deuschl, Gunther ^a   Krack, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPARKINSON AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ERROR; FEMALE; FINGER; HABITUATION; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PARKINSON DISEASE; PERFORMANCE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RATING SCALE; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

COGNITION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARKINSON DISEASE; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS;

EID: 2442623625     PISSN: 00039942     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.61.5.697     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Pillon B, Ardouin C, Damier P, et al. Neuropsychological changes batween "off" and "on" STN or GPi stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 2000;55:411-418.
2. Jahanshahi M, Ardouin CM, Brown RG, et al. The impact of deep brain stimulation on executive function in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2000;123:1142-1154.
3. Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale. Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc; 1988.
4. Wenzelburger R, Koper F, Zhang BR, et al. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson's disease preferentially improves akinesia of proximal arm movements compared to finger movements. Mov Disord. 2003;18:1162-1169.
5. Wechsler D. WAIS-R Manual. San Antonio, Tex: Psychological Corp; 1987.
6. Benton AL. Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia. 1968;6:53-60.
7. Perret E. The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. Neuropsychologia. 1974;12:323-330.
8. Evans F. Monitoring attention deployment by random number generation: an index to measure subjective randomness. Bull Psychonom Soc. 1987;12:35-38.
9. Spatt J, Goldenberg G. Components of random generation by normal subjects and patients with dysexecutive syndrome. Brain Cogn. 1993;23:231-242.
10. Ardouin C, Pillon B, Peiffer E, et al. Bilateral subthalamic or pallidal stimulation for Parkinson's disease affects neither memory nor executive functions: a consecutive series of 62 patients. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:217-223.
11. Brown RG, Soliveri P, Jahanshahi M. Executive processes in Parkinson's disease: random number generation and response suppression. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36:1355-1362.
12. Daniels C, Witt K, Wolff S, Jansen O, Deuschl G. Rate dependency of the human cortical network subserving executive functions during generation of random number series: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci Lett. 2003;345:25-28.
13. Saint-Cyr JA, Trepanier LL, Kumar R, Lozano AM, Lang AE. Neuropsychological consequences of chronic bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2000;123:2091-2108.
14. Malapani C, Pillon B, Dubois B, Agid Y. Impaired simultaneous cognitive task performance in Parkinson's disease: a dopamine-related dysfunction. Neurology. 1994;44:319-326.