Erratum: Exponential stability for small perturbations of steep integrable Hamiltonian systems (Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems (2004) DOI: 10.1017/S014338570300049X);Exponential stability for small perturbations of steep integrable Hamiltonian systems

Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 593-608

  Niederman, Laurent ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442622471     PISSN: 01433857     EISSN: 14694417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/etds.2013.113     Document Type: Erratum

References (20)

1. G. Benettin, F. Fasso and M. Guzzo. Nekhorochev stability of L4 and L5 in the spatial restricted three body problem. Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 3(3) (1998), 56-72.
2. G. Benettin and G. Gallavotti. Stability of motions near resonances in quasi-integrable Hamiltonian systems. J. Stat. Phys. 44 (1986), 293-338.
3. G. Benettin, L. Galgani and A. Giorgilli. A proof of Nekhorochev's theorem for the stability times in nearly-integrable Hamiltonian systems. Celestial Mech. 37 (1985), 1-25.
4. F. Fasso, M. Guzzo and G. Benettin. Nekhorochev-stability of elliptic equilibria of Hamiltonian systems. Comm. Math. Phys. 197(2) (1998), 347-360.
5. A. Giorgilli and E. Zehnder. Exponential stability for time dependent potential. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 43 (1992), 827-855.
6. M. Guzzo and A. Morbidelli. Construction of a Nekhorochev like result for the asteroid belt dynamical system. Celestial Mech. 66 (1997), 255-292.
7. M. Herman. Dynamics connected with indefinite normal torsion. Twists Mapping and Their Applications (I.M.A. Conference Proceedings Series, 44). Eds. R. McGehee and K. Meyer. Springer, New York, 1992, pp. 153-182.
8. I.S. Ilyashenko. A steepness test for analytic functions. Russian Math. Surveys 41 (1986), 229-230.
9. P. Lochak. Canonical perturbation theory via simultaneous approximation. Russian Math. Surveys 47 (1992), 57-133.
10. P. Lochak, J.-P. Marco and D. Sauzin. On the splitting of the invariant manifolds in multidimensional near-integrable Hamiltonian systems. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 775 (2003).
11. P. Lochak and A. I. Neishtadt. Estimates of stability time for nearly integrable systems with a quasiconvex Hamiltonian. Chaos 2 (1992), 495-499.
12. J.-P. Marco and D. Sauzin. Stability and instability for Gevrey quasi-convex near-integrable Hamiltonian systems. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etud. Sci. 96 (2002), 199-275.
13. N. N. Nekhorochev. Stable lower estimates for smooth mappings and for gradients of smooth functions. Math. USSR Sbornik 19(3) (1973), 425-467.
14. N. N. Nekhorochev. An exponential estimate of the time of stability of nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems. Russian Math. Surveys 32 (1977), 1-65.
15. N. N. Nekhorochev. An exponential estimate of the time of stability of nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems 2. Trudy Sem. Petrovs 5 (1979), 5-50. Translated in Topics in Modern Mathematics (Petrovskii Semin., 5). Ed. O. A. Oleinik. Consultant Bureau, New York, 1985.
16. N. N. Nekhorochev. An exponential estimate of the time of stability of nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems 2. Trudy Sem. Petrovs 5 (1979), 5-50. Translated in Topics in Modern Mathematics (Petrovskii Semin., 5). Ed. O. A. Oleinik. Consultant Bureau, New York, 1985.
17. L. Niederman. Nonlinear stability around an elliptic equilibrium point in an Hamiltonian system. Nonlinearity 11 (1998), 1465-1479.
18. J. Poschel. Nekhorochev estimates for quasi-convex Hamiltonian systems. Math. Z. 213 (1993), 187-217.
19. J. Poschel. On Nekhoroshev's estimate at an elliptic equilibrium. Int. Math. Res. Not. 4 (1999), 203-215.
20. W. M. Schmidt. Approximation to algebraic numbers. Enseign. Math., II. Sr. 17 (1971), 187-253.