|
Volumn 4, Issue , 2000, Pages 961-1070
|
Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation).
[No Author Info available]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BEHAVIOR;
CONJOINED TWINS;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
HOMICIDE;
HUMAN;
INFANT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
PARENT;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
RE A (CHILDREN) (CONJOINED TWINS: SURGICAL SEPARATION);
SOCIOECONOMICS;
SURGERY;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
RE A (CHILDREN) (CONJOINED TWINS: SURGICAL SEPARATION);
DECISION MAKING;
DOUBLE EFFECT;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HOMICIDE;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
INTENTION;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
PARENTS;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TWINS, CONJOINED;
VALUE OF LIFE;
|
EID: 2442618266
PISSN: 00025569
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (31)
|
References (0)
|